Subscribe Now!

National
Right to Life News Today

Volume 39, Number 2                                                                                  www.nrlc.org                                                                                                    Spring 2012

 

Opposition Continues to Grow against Obama’s
Unprecedented Assault on Religious Liberty

By Dave Andrusko

When the Senate narrowly defeated the Blunt Amendment, the rights of conscience unquestionably took a hit. The 51–48 vote temporarily stymied the effort to amend the Obama health care law (“ObamaCare”) to prevent the use of that law to issue regulatory mandates that violate the religious or moral convictions of those who purchase or provide health insurance.

However, the March 1 vote, while regrettable, is only one skirmish in a battle that will continue the courts, in Congress, and at the ballot box.

The arithmetic of the vote was straightforward. Democrats control the Senate; all voting Republicans but one voted for the amendment, while all but three Democrats voted against it. The Obama Administration called the Blunt Amendment “dangerous and wrong.”

That assessment may fly with a body controlled by his fellow Democrats, who have called these determined efforts to respect religious freedom part of a “war on women,” but it will crash and burn with the electorate. It cannot be said often enough that the Blunt Amendment would have merely restored traditional conscience protections, does not affect any federal law other than ObamaCare, and does not apply to state laws.

Read more...


House Cosponsor List Hits 154
Defeat of Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act a Top Priority,
Say Pro-Abortion Leaders

WASHINGTON (March 22, 2012)—Pro-abortion groups have sounded the alarm about a new pro-life bill introduced recently in Congress at the instigation of the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), declaring that its defeat is a priority for the pro-abortion movement because it poses a grave threat to the entire legal structure that maintains legal abortion on demand.

The statements were made by Eleanor Holmes Norton, the non-voting delegate who represents the District of Columbia in the U.S. House of Representatives. Norton sponsored a Capitol Hill press conference on February 21 in collaboration with the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), NARAL, and the National Abortion Federation, solely to attack the District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.

The legislation was introduced in the House on January 23, 2012, by Congressman Trent Franks (R-Az.), as H.R. 3803, and as of March 22 had 154 House cosponsors. (218 constitutes an absolute majority in the 435-member House.) It was introduced in the Senate on February 13 by Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah), as S. 2103, and as of March 22 had six Senate cosponsors.

Read more...



BULK SUBSCRIPTIONS
of NRL News are available!!!
Click here for details

Click here
for an easy way to help your Pro-Life friends and NRL News

ATTENTION:
Be a Part of the NRLC Email List

From the President

Carol Tobias

The Real “War on Women”

According to the “mainstream” media and prominent Democrat leaders like President Obama and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, there is a cultural “war on women” taking place in America. It’s a great slogan ginned up to motivate the President’s liberal supporters. Women are being victimized, but not in the way the media is portraying it. Let’s take a look at three areas important in this so-called “war.”

Planned Parenthood
The Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) is the largest abortion provider in the country. It has an annual budget of more than $1 billion. Roughly 46% of that comes from government (federal, state, and local) health service grants and reimbursements.

Many people don’t like the fact that tax dollars are given to an organization that kills unborn babies. About this time last year, several states and the U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation to cut off, or reduce, tax dollars that go to abortion-promoting organizations like PPFA. This quickly became known as the “war on women.” Why? Because PPFA affiliates perform abortions (which are only done on women) and they advertise breast cancer screenings (again—women only), but PPFA doesn’t do mammograms; it refers women to someplace else for the procedure.

Read Carol Tobias's Entire Column
 


NRL News Archive

2012
Winter 2012
Spring 2012

2011
January 2011
February/March 2011
April/May 2011
June/July 2011
Fall 2011

2010
NRL News 2010 Subject Index
January 2010
February/March 2010

April/May 2010
June/July 2010
August/September 2010
October 2010
November/December 2010

2009
NRL News 2009 Subject Index
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July/August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November/December 2009

2008
NRL News 2008 Subject Index
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July/August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November/December 2008

2007
NRL News 2007 Subject Index
January 2007
February 2007

March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007

July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007

December 2007

2006
NRL News 2006 Subject Index
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006

April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006

December 2006

2005
NRL News 2005 Subject Index
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005

2004
NRL News 2004 Subject Index
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
J
une 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004

December 2004

2003
NRL News 2003 Subject Index
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003

2002
NRL News 2002 Subject Index
January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002

May 2002

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002

2001
NRL News 2001 Subject Index
January 2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
May 2001
June 2001
July 2001
August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001

2000
NRL News 2000 Subject Index
January 2000
February 2000
March 2000
April 2000
May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
December 2000

1999
NRL News 1999 Subject Index
January 22, 1999
February 19, 1999
March 15, 1999
April 8, 1999
May 11, 1999
June 10, 1999
July 6, 1999
August 10, 1999
September 14, 1999
October 12, 1999
November 1999
December 1999

1998
NRL News 1998 Subject Index
January 1998
February 11, 1998
March 11, 1998
April 14, 1998
May 7, 1998
July 8, 1998
June 9, 1998
August 12, 1998
September 28, 1998
October 12, 1998
November 17, 1998
December 10, 1998

1997
NRL News 1997 Subject Index
December 9, 1997

Subject Indexes for 1990 - 1996
NRL News 1996 Subject Index
NRL News 1995 Subject Index
NRL News 1994 Subject Index
NRL News 1993 Subject Index
NRL News 1992 Subject Index
NRL News 1991 Subject Index
NRL News 1990 Subject Index