Today's News & Views


January 2009
Vol. 36,  No. 1


Obama Administration, New Congress Poised to Push Broad Pro-Abortion Agenda

WASHINGTON (January 2, 2009)--The pro-life movement is bracing for battle as a new Congress convenes with pro-abortion Democrats in majority control in both houses, poised to work with incoming President Barack Obama to push an expansive pro-abortion agenda.

2009 will be the first time since 1994 that both houses of Congress are under pro-abortion majority control at the same time as a pro-abortion president is in office.

"The alignment of a hard-core pro-abortion president with pro-abortion Democratic majorities in Congress means that many existing pro-life policies are now in great jeopardy," said NRLC Legislative Director Douglas Johnson. "Some damage is inevitable, but the extent to which the Obama abortion agenda will be achieved will depend on the perception of elected policymakers as to how the public is responding to the proposed changes."

During his years in the Illinois state Senate (1996–2004), Obama was a leader in opposing pro-life legislation, including bills to ban partial-birth abortions and to protect infants who are born alive during abortions. During his four years in the U.S. Senate (2005–08), he always voted against the pro-life side, and he cosponsored the so-called "Freedom of Choice Act" (FOCA), a proposed federal law that would invalidate virtually all limits on abortion.

Continue article...

Goals for 2009: Double Membership, Expand Chapter Base
By Dave Andrusko

The election of pro-abortion Senator, now President-elect, Barack Obama crystallized and gave enormous added impetus to a plan already in the works to grow National Right to Life to unprecedented size in 2009. This all-out commitment to a surge in dues-paying membership and local chapters development dovetails with the focus of this special commemorative edition of National Right to Life News: "Stop the Obama Abortion Agenda."

By the time most of you receive this edition, Obama will have already begun to flesh out a few of the details of his administration's all-out assault on the pro-life legacy of President George W. Bush, Obama's commitment to integrating abortion into our national health care structure, and his preliminary moves to pave the way for eventual passage of the "Freedom of Choice Act" (FOCA), which is much more accurately described as the "Federal No-Limits-On-Abortion Bill." (See Douglas Johnson's story on page one and sidebar on page 17.)

Our job is to defeat proposals where we can, minimize the damage where we cannot, and to raise high the banner that signals that we are growing stronger as we rebound from a tough 2008 election cycle. It can be done. With your invaluable help, it will be done.

Continue article...

An Important Message
From the President of NRLC

Obama wants “choice” to be the law of the land.  He told Planned Parenthood during the campaign that “the first thing I’d do as President is to sign the Freedom of Choice Act” (FOCA).

But we saw the threat of FOCA.  The National Right to Life Political Action Committee made sure that millions of pro-lifers all across the country were told about Obama’s pledge to sign FOCA as his first act if he was elected.  Thousands of churches educated their members on the abortion dangers of FOCA.

With all this negative publicity it now appears Obama and his allies have decided to change their strategy.

Apparently they’ve decided to achieve the same ends as FOCA through piecemeal legislation. 

This legislation would be every bit as deadly to unborn babies as FOCA and even more challenging to defeat.

You will have to be ready to respond rapidly to each new threat.
No matter their strategy, Obama and his allies are going to fight hard for their abortion agenda.  You and I have to fight back just as hard.


Be a Part of the NRLC E-Mail List

Be a part of the National Right to Life E-mail List. We are sending out up-to-the-minute alerts that deal with pro-life legislation, breaking pro-life news, and much, much more.

This will not be a daily abortion update, but rather a way to bring crucial, time-sensitive material to our grassroots supporters.

So, don't delay and sign up today!!

of NRL News are available!!!
Click here for details

|HOME - -|

Vol. 36, No. 1


From the President

Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

By Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

The last election was a disappointment, because economic concerns swamped all other issues confronting the electorate.  However, the pro-life volunteers for NRL PAC and the political action committees of NRLC’s state affiliates did their job providing election information to voters. In a post-election poll commissioned by NRLC, 34% of respondents said their vote was affected by the abortion issue: 25% voting for pro-life candidates and 9% voting for pro-abortion candidates, making for a “pro-life difference” of 19%.

Post-election defeatists, directing their anger at NRLC (because our legislative activity “still hasn’t outlawed abortion after all these years”), have a fundamental misunderstanding about Roe v. Wade:  In 1973, the Supreme Court did not “legalize” abortion, it constitutionalized it.  That means that Roe v. Wade must either be overturned by the Supreme Court itself or nullified by a constitutional amendment.

The first realistic goal for pro-lifers is to elect presidents and senators willing to appoint and confirm Supreme Court judges who respect the Constitution and are willing to reverse the extra-constitutional Roe v. Wade decision.  We have not yet fully realized the goal of an anti-Roe majority on the Supreme Court, but most observers believe we are a lot closer now than we were in 1973 when the decision was imposed by a 7 to 2 pro-abortion majority.  The Obama presidency threatens to cause a delay in this quest, but true pro-lifers don’t give up.

The second, equally urgent, goal for pro-lifers is to change women’s attitudes about abortion and make abortion less likely.  On this front, we have made great progress.

Read Dr. Franz's Entire Column

NRL News 2008 Subject Index

NRL News Archive

January 2008

February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July/August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November/December 2008

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007

July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007

December 2007

January 2006

February 2006
March 2006

April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006

December 2006

January 2005

February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005

January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
une 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004

December 2004

January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003

January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002

May 2002

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002

January 2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
May 2001
June 2001
July 2001
August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001

January 2000
February 2000
March 2000
April 2000
May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
December 2000

January 22, 1999
February 19, 1999
March 15, 1999
April 8, 1999
May 11, 1999
June 10, 1999
July 6, 1999
August 10, 1999
September 14, 1999
October 12, 1999
November 1999
December 1999

January 1998
February 11, 1998
March 11, 1998
April 14, 1998
May 7, 1998
July 8, 1998
June 9, 1998
August 12, 1998
September 28, 1998
October 12, 1998
November 17, 1998
December 10, 1998

December 9, 1997

Subscribe Today to NRL News