Today's News & Views

 Order Now
Special January 22 NRL News.
 "Roe v. Wade:A Decision Under Siege"


DECEMBER 2005
Vol. 32, No. 12


Justices Hear Oral Arguments in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood
By Dave Andrusko

WASHINGTON (November 30)--Minutes after the Supreme Court finished hearing oral arguments in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, advocates for both sides were outside giving their take on what the Justices heard in an hour of back and forth and speculating about how the Court might rule on a facial challenge to the state's 2003 parental notice law.

"You never put too much stock into the justices' questions, or get hung up on what you think their 'body language' is revealing," said NRLC State Legislation Director Mary Balch. "These are very intelligent people who are probing your argument, sometimes to solidify a position they have already tentatively reached, sometimes to lobby their fellow justices, and sometimes because they genuinely don't know how this case will come out."

James Bopp, Jr., General Counsel for National Right to Life, answers questions on the steps of the Supreme Court after the oral arguments on Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood.

The Court, as it has more of late, allowed the public to hear the entire exchange just a little over an hour after the hearings concluded. C-SPAN television and radio carried the 60-minute-long discussion in its entirety. Several considerations stand out.

First, there was the presence of the new Chief Justice, John Roberts. He asked particularly probing questions, on occasion formulating the arguments more clearly than the attorneys arguing for and against the law, who are under enormous pressure. Roberts is clearly every bit as bright as he appeared to be in his confirmation hearings.

Second, there was Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, still on the bench months after announcing her retirement. Should her successor be confirmed before a decision on Ayotte is announced--and her absence means there is a 4–4 tie--the Court has the option of re-hearing the case.

Many observers predicted the justices would spend considerable time on question of "standard of review." By this they mean just how high--or low--the bar is set to determine whether a law can be stopped even before it goes into effect.

Continue article...


Heightened Interest in Alito's Views on Abortion
as Hearings Approach
By Dave Anduskso

With Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on the nomination of Federal Appeals Court Judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court set to begin January 9, interest in the abortion issue has been heightened by a memo he wrote in 1985 as a Justice Department lawyer in the Reagan Administration and a job application submitted later the same year. Coincidentally, the documents became public in reverse order from when they were actually written.

Alito submitted the job application in November 1985 when he was working in the solicitor general's office and seeking a post as deputy assistant attorney general. Referring to the Supreme Court case of Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Alito wrote of having helped ''to advance legal positions in which I personally believe very strongly" while in the solicitor general's office.

He went on to say, ''I am particularly proud of my contributions in recent cases in which the government has argued in the Supreme Court that racial and ethnic quotas should not be allowed and that the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion."

President George W. Bush with U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Samuel Alito after his nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court . 

The application was released November 14 by the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library.

As part of the confirmation process, Alito met with pro-abortion Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Ca.). She asked about it. "He said: 'I was an advocate seeking a job. It was a political job, and that was 1985,'" Feinstein told reporters. She said she believed his response to be ''absolutely truthful."

Continue article...




ATTENTION:
Be a Part of the NRLC E-Mail List

www.nrlc.org/join_our_mailing_list.htm

Be a part of the National Right to Life E-mail List. We are sending out up-to-the-minute alerts that deal with pro-life legislation, breaking pro-life news, and much, much more.

This will not be a daily abortion update, but rather a way to bring crucial, time-sensitive material to our grassroots supporters.

So, don't delay and sign up today!!

The address again is
www.nrlc.org/join_our_mailing_list.htm


BULK SUBSCRIPTIONS
of NRL News are available!!!
Click here for details



|HOME - - www.nrlc.org|

Vol. 32, No. 12

 

 

From the President

Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

THE PRO-ABORTIONISTS ARE ORGANIZING…HOW WILL YOU RESPOND?

... How can you help NRLC?

There are several ways.

n Pray for the mothers who face a difficult pregnancy so that they choose life for their unborn babies. Pray for the conversion of the abortionists and those who work, propagandize, and legislate for the "right" to kill unborn babies. Pray for the pro-life movement; especially the staff of NRLC, the state affiliates of NRLC, the supporters of NRLC, and those who have joined us through the state affiliates of NRLC.

n Join the NRLC affiliate in your state and recruit others for our cause. Remember that Planned Parenthood's "Action Network" registered 782,384 by May 2005. And NARAL had 30,000 "rapid responders" in a short time. We must respond with the same intensity. We must able to out-work them on the grassroots level.

n Make a tax-deductible donation to the National Right to Life Educational Trust Fund (payable to NRL Educational Trust Fund, 512 10th St. NW, Washington, DC 20004). Remember that NARAL "surpassed its fundraised goals in the hours following Justice O'Connor's announcement." We must raise as much money as we can in order to compete with them in the public square.

The monies in the NRL Educational Trust Fund are used for the educational work of NRLC.

Read Dr. Franz's Entire Column


Complete NRL News
2005 Subject Index



NRL News Archive

2005
January 2005

February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005

2004
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
J
une 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004

December 2004

2003
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003

2002
January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002

May 2002

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002

2001
January 2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
May 2001
June 2001
July 2001
August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001

2000
January 2000
February 2000
March 2000
April 2000
May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
December 2000

1999
January 22, 1999
February 19, 1999
March 15, 1999
April 8, 1999
May 11, 1999
June 10, 1999
July 6, 1999
August 10, 1999
September 14, 1999
October 12, 1999
November 1999
December 1999

1998
January 1998
February 11, 1998
March 11, 1998
April 14, 1998
May 7, 1998
July 8, 1998
June 9, 1998
August 12, 1998
September 28, 1998
October 12, 1998
November 17, 1998
December 10, 1998

1997
December 9, 1997


Subscribe Today to NRL News

Click here for ordering information