click here for Today's News & Views

 OCTOBER 2005
Vol. 32, No. 10


Bush Nominates Miers to Replace O'Connor on High Court
By Dave Andrusko

Harriet Miers after her nomination.  President George W. Bush looks on.

When pro-life President George W. Bush introduced Harriet Miers to the American people as his nominee to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, little was known about her other than that she has been the President's White House Counsel since 2003 and that she is intensely loyal to the President. In the days that followed, a fuller picture began to emerge.

"To begin with, Ms. Miers "will strictly interpret our Constitution and laws," Mr. Bush promised. "She will not legislate from the bench."

"At her October 3 introduction, Miers added, "It is the responsibility of every generation to be true to the founders' vision of the proper role of the courts in our society. If confirmed, I recognize that I will have a tremendous responsibility to keep our judicial system strong, and to help ensure that the courts meet their obligations to strictly apply the laws and the Constitution."

"There is also now a fair amount known about Miers in the context of the abortion issue.

"Between 1990 and 1992, the influential American Bar Association (ABA) zigged and zagged on abortion three times, going from pro-abortion, to neutrality, and back to pro-abortion again in 1992. Miers worked against adoption of the pro-abortion position and then, while president of the Texas State Bar in 1993, urged the ABA to conduct a referendum of its full membership.

Continue article...


Roberts Confirmed as 17th Chief Justice of the United States
By
Dave Andrusko

Judge John Roberts and family.

"If people can't vote for you [John Roberts], then I doubt they can vote for any Republican nominee."   
    
Sen. Orrin Hatch

"Roberts's performance so far has been so masterful, so disarming that the political left has foundered in its effort to tag him as some sort of scary extremist. The vast mushy middle seems accepting and the right is still thrilled."  
    
Terry Neal, Washington Post

Even before John Roberts raised his hand and solemnly swore to "support and defend the Constitution," in the process becoming the youngest leader of the Supreme Court in nearly 200 years, pro-abortion Senate Democrats were issuing ominous warnings that his relatively peaceful confirmation as Chief Justice of the United States could be the calm before the storm.

There were vows to press the next Supreme Court nominee--who turned out to be White House Counsel Harriet Miers--for more specific assurances, threats of filibusters, and routine use of the term Armageddon.

Not that pro-abortion Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee didn't try to stir up opposition to the 50-year-old Roberts, who succeeds his mentor, the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist.




ATTENTION:
Be a Part of the NRLC E-Mail List

www.nrlc.org/join_our_mailing_list.htm

Be a part of the National Right to Life E-mail List. We are sending out up-to-the-minute alerts that deal with pro-life legislation, breaking pro-life news, and much, much more.

This will not be a daily abortion update, but rather a way to bring crucial, time-sensitive material to our grassroots supporters.

So, don't delay and sign up today!!

The address again is
www.nrlc.org/join_our_mailing_list.htm


BULK SUBSCRIPTIONS
of NRL News are available!!!
Click here for details



|HOME - - www.nrlc.org|

Vol. 32, No. 10

 

 

From the President

Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

THE SPECTER OF "SUPER-DUPER PRECEDENTS”
By Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

Sen. Arlen Specter: And I don't want to coin any phrases on super-precedents--we'll leave that to the Supreme Court--but would you think that Roe might be a super-duper precedent in light of ... [LAUGHTER] ... in light of 38 occasions to overrule it?

Judge John Roberts: Well, the interesting thing, of course, is not simply the opportunity to address it, but when the court actually considers the question. And that, of course, is in the Casey decision, where it did apply the principles of stare decisis and specifically addressed it. And that I think is the decision that any judge in this area would begin with.--from the transcript of the confirmation hearings of Chief Justice John Roberts

In this exchange our new Chief Justice gently informed Senator Specter that the governing "super-duper" precedent is Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992), not Roe v. Wade (1973). As Fourth Circuit Appeals Judge Michael Luttig ruefully put it, "I understand the Supreme Court to have intended its decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) to be a super-stare decisis [Latin for let it stand] with respect to a woman's fundamental right to choose whether or not to proceed with a pregnancy. ... And I believe this understanding to have been not merely confirmed, but reinforced by the Court's recent decision in Stenberg v. Carhart (2000)."

So, abortion law is now governed by Casey, not Roe. The notoriously broad definition of "health " in Doe v. Bolton (the companion decision to Roe) remains, however, intact; thus abortion on demand is still the law of the land. Our task is not only to undo Roe, but to overturn Casey and Carhart as well.

Read Dr. Franz's Entire Column


Complete NRL News
2005 Subject Index



NRL News Archive

1997
DECEMBER 9, 1997

1998
JANUARY 1998
FEBRUARY 11, 1998
MARCH 11, 1998
APRIL 14, 1998
MAY 7, 1998
JULY 8, 1998
JUNE 9, 1998
AUGUST 12, 1998
SEPTEMBER 28, 1998
OCTOBER 12, 1998
NOVEMBER 17, 1998
DECEMBER 10, 1998


1999
JANUARY 22, 1999
FEBRUARY 19, 1999
MARCH 15, 1999
APRIL 8, 1999
MAY 11, 1999
JUNE 10, 1999
JULY 6, 1999
AUGUST 10, 1999
SEPTEMBER 14, 1999
OCTOBER 12, 1999
NOVEMBER 1999
DECEMBER 1999

2000
January 2000
February 2000
March 2000
April 2000
May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
December 2000

2001
January 2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
May 2001
June 2001
July 2001
August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001

2002
January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002

May 2002

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002

2003
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003

2004
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
J
une 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004

December 2004

2005
January 2005

February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
Octobter 2005


Subscribe Today to NRL News

Click here for ordering information