click here for Today's News & Views

May 2005
Vol. 32, No. 5


Proudly Pro-Life Awards Dinner Honors Archbishop Chaput, Richard and Helen DeVos

Archbishop Charles Chaput, Helen and Richard DeVos.

McCain joins with Democrats to save filibuster
Senate "Too Close to Call" on Abolishing Filibusters of Judges

WASHINGTON (May 4, 2005) - - At NRL News deadline, the U.S. Senate was fast approaching a razor-close vote on the question of whether Senate Democrats will continue to be allowed to filibuster to block approval of President Bush's judicial nominees.

The Senate will soon decide whether a judicial nominee should be able to achieve confirmation if he or she enjoys the support of a simple majority of the Senate, which is the position supported by pro-life Senator Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tn.) and most Republican senators - - or whether a minority will continue to be allowed to erect a 60-vote hurdle, which is the position currently backed by Democratic senators and by a handful of Republicans.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tn.) vows to force reform vote soon. Sen. John McCain (R-Az.) will join with Democrats to preserve filibuster of judicial nominees.

Who Opposes Filibuster Reform?

As of May 4, 2005, all of the 45 members of the Senate Democratic caucus were opposing the effort of Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tn.) to abolish filibusters on judicial nominees.

If more than five Republican senators vote with the Democrats, it will not be possible to establish the precedent that filibusters are not allowed on judicial nominations.

As of May 4, three Republican senators had come out clearly against the reform: Lincoln Chafee (RI), Olympia Snowe (Me.), and John McCain (Az.).

McCain, who some political observers expect to seek the Republican presidential nomination in 2008 as he did in 2000, announced in April that he will oppose the reform.

On the MSNBC program Hardball on April 11, host Chris Matthews asked McCain, "You'll vote with the Democrats?" McCain replied, "Yes . . ."

Continue Article...



 

From the President

Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

The tragic death of Terri Schindler-Schiavo reminds pro-lifers of the work confronting us on the issue of euthanasia. That is at least what most opinion polls tell us. One can object that many polls were improperly or misleadingly phrased and that, therefore, one cannot reach the above conclusion. But we need to be realistic in assessing the situation. To this end I invite you to join me in a sober analysis of the polls.

* Although there was conflicting medical testimony, several polls described Terri as being in "a persistent vegetative state" (e.g., CNN/USA Today/Gallup, 3/18/2005, 3/22/2005, 4/1-2/2005; Time, 3/22-24/2005; CBS News, 3/21-22/2005; Fox News/Opinion Dynamics, 3/1-2/2005).

* Some polls falsely described Terri as being on "life support" (e.g., ABC News, 3/10-13/2005, 3/20/2005; CBS News, 3/21-22/2005) or in a "coma-like state," contrary to the widely disseminated video images (Time, 3/22-24/2005; Fox News/Opinion Dynamics, 3/1-2/2005).

* Poll respondents were also asked to speculate as to whether reinserting Terri's feeding tube would eventually "have improved" Terri's condition or have led to "significant improvement in her brain activity" (Fox News/Opinion Dynamics, 3/29-30/2005; CNN/ USA Today/Gallup, 3/22/2005). Most polls and the media made the unsubstantiated "diagnosis" that Terri is "in a persistent vegetative state," and then the polls asked the respondents (with an equal lack of credentials) to make their own diagnosis. Not surprisingly, the majority (60% and 54%) said that Terri's condition could not have improved.

Continue Dr. Franz's Column


Complete NRL News
2004 Subject Index



NRL News
Archive

1997
DECEMBER 9, 1997

1998
JANUARY 1998
FEBRUARY 11, 1998
MARCH 11, 1998
APRIL 14, 1998
MAY 7, 1998
JULY 8, 1998
JUNE 9, 1998
AUGUST 12, 1998
SEPTEMBER 28, 1998
OCTOBER 12, 1998
NOVEMBER 17, 1998
DECEMBER 10, 1998


1999
JANUARY 22, 1999
FEBRUARY 19, 1999
MARCH 15, 1999
APRIL 8, 1999
MAY 11, 1999
JUNE 10, 1999
JULY 6, 1999
AUGUST 10, 1999
SEPTEMBER 14, 1999
OCTOBER 12, 1999
NOVEMBER 1999
DECEMBER 1999

2000
January 2000
February 2000
March 2000
April 2000
May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
November 2000
December 2000

2001
January 2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
May 2001
June 2001
July 2001
August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001

2002
January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002

May 2002

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002

2003
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003

2004
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
J
une 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004

December 2004

2005
January 2005

February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005


Subscribe Today to NRL News

Click here for ordering information