For immediate release: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
For more information: Megan Dillon (202) 626-8825
National Right to Life Responds to Ruling on Gonzales
v. OregonToday, in Gonzales v. Oregon, the
U.S. Supreme Court held in a 6-3 ruling that the Attorney General
does not have authority to prevent the use of federally controlled
drugs to assist suicide.
"The Court held that the use of federally
controlled drugs for the purpose of assisting suicide is not 'drug
abuse' because the physician is not facilitating drug addiction, but
instead seeking to kill. This is a shocking conclusion since one of
the things that we most fear in drug abuse is danger to the life of
the addict," stated Dorothy Timbs, legislative counsel for the NRLC
Robert Powell Center for Medical Ethics.
"This decision reflects the Court's interpretation
of what Congress intended in passing the Federal Controlled
Substances Act. Nothing in the decision suggests that Congress lacks
the constitutional authority to amend the Act to make clear that
federally controlled drugs may not be used to kill people."
"This sets a dangerous precedent for all
vulnerable Americans, especially those with disabilities and life or
health-threatening illnesses. Drugs should be used to cure and
relieve pain, never to kill," said Timbs.
NRLC is the nation's largest pro-life
organization, with 50 state affiliates and approximately 3,000 local
affiliates nationwide. NRLC works through legislation and education
to protect those threatened by abortion, infanticide, euthanasia,
and assisted suicide. |