|
NRL News
Page 2
July/August 2009
Volume 36
Issue 7-8
Abortion,
Health Care “Reform,” and Obama’s Falling Popularity
By Dave Andrusko
“With all
his gifts and charisma, it is tragic beyond words that Mr. Obama has
chosen to promote the culture of death and in record time has made
the White House the wholly owned subsidiary of the abortion lobby.
For a man who has been given so much to then deny the right to
live—to exist—to those who have so little is, well, unfair and
tragic. He has done much harm—and is capable of inflicting much
more. Thus through prayer, fasting and smart work we must absolutely
resolve to stop his misguided abortion agenda. This can and must be
our finest hour.”
Pro-life Congressman Chris Smith, speaking at the NRLC 2009
closing Banquet
Over the
years I’ve been known to attempt to provide a motivational message
or two. But when I listen to Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ), the
co-chairman of the bipartisan Congressional Pro-Life Caucus, I
realize he operates in a different universe from the rest of us. He
brims with such keen intelligence, fiery passion, and unswerveable
commitment that after listening to him, you can’t help but wonder
what you are doing sleeping at night.
His full
speech at the convention can be found at
http://www.nrlc.org/News_and_Views/June09/nv062609.html. Next
time you need an instant picker-upper, read it.
I begin
with Chris’s speech, because he reminded us that this can—and must
be—our finest hour. We are up against a formidable coalition of
veteran pro-abortionists, led by the President, who, though very
inexperienced, should never be underestimated. Not since John F.
Kennedy have large segments of the American people so desperately
wanted to believe in a President.
At the
same time, the higher (and unthinking) the admiration, the harder
the eventual reaction will be when reality firmly sets in.
Pro-abortion Presidsent Barack Obama won because he tapped into both
our fears and hopes, which allowed him to bamboozle the electorate
into thinking he was a moderate who would put away old things in
Washington. His all-out radicalism on abortion is a symbol of a man
who has planted his flag on the far left side of the political
spectrum.
My point
is simply that after the binge, a sobering up is inevitable. And
there is evidence it has not only begun but is picking up speed. One
recent headline put it bluntly: “Will Obama Continue to Defy
Gravity?” If he doesn’t, if politically Obama falls to earth, it
will likely be in no small measure because his signature
initiative—health care reform—crashed and burned.
Another
headline (from the Associated Press) helps us understand why that
this “reform” could be in grave danger: “Gov’t insurance would allow
coverage for abortion.”
Richard
Alonso-Zaldivar began his story with a very telling observation.
Thanks in large part to NRLC, the truth is ever-so-gradually making
its way through rock-hard media resistance, like a dandelion
breaking through a concrete sidewalk.
Alonso-Zaldivar
wrote, “Health care legislation before Congress would allow a new
government-sponsored insurance plan to cover abortions, a decision
that would affect millions of women and recast federal policy on the
divisive issue.” A few paragraphs later he adds, “Advocates on both
sides are preparing for a renewed battle over abortion, which could
jeopardize political support for President Barack Obama’s health
care initiative aimed at covering nearly 50 million uninsured and
restraining medical costs.”
The
July/August issue of National Right to Life News is chock-full of
articles you need to read, both about the abortion-enhancing
propensities of the proposed bills and the threat of rationing as
well. If you have friends who are not subscribers, encourage them to
call us at (202) 626-8828 and we’ll get the issue out to them
post-haste.
People on
the Hill who are much savvier than I am always remind us to “follow
the money.” Pro-abortionists may hem and haw, may (or may not)
temporarily put part of their agenda on hold, and will for sure look
to the heavens and vow that they are working diligently to find a
“compromise.” (If you are looking for their truth quotient, take
those assurances, divide by 10, and then multiply by zero.)
But
access to hundreds of millions of dollars, parceled out to the likes
of Planned Parenthood to grease the gears of the killing
machine—this is not negotiable. Please remember that over the next
month when you go to listen to your congressman and senators talk
about their position on health care “reform.”
On a
related note, you read the same stories I do, so you know Obama’s
popularity, if not in free fall, is clearly heading south. There are
many ways of measuring that besides polls gauging the public’s
opinion of him. Let me offer what’s going on in Virginia, the state
my family lives in, as an object lesson.
Virginia
and New Jersey are the only states with gubernatorial elections this
year. We have a solid pro-life Republican and a pro-abortion
Democrat. The headline from the Washington Post speaks volumes: “Is
Race for Governor More about Obama?” The Democrat, R. Creigh Deeds,
finds himself in the unenviable position of trying to keep the
increasingly less popular Obama at arm’s length at the same time
maintaining the loyalty of those Virginians who remain in the
President’s camp.
“There is
no empirical evidence at this point in Virginia’s race for governor
showing that huge numbers of voters think like [a particular voter
profiled in the story] and will respond by sending a message to
Washington,” writes the Post. “But Obama’s policies are nonetheless
having immediate consequences in the campaign as the candidates
adjust their strategies to account for the president’s controversial
domestic agenda, which has overshadowed many state issues. “
In fact
I’m sure both Deeds and his Republican counterpart, Bob McDonnell,
have done extensive polling. They know exactly whether Obama is
increasingly a life preserver, which will buoy Deeds, or an anchor,
which will help drag Deeds down to defeat in November.
Another
article in that same Post issue was headlined, “Obama Returns to
Grass Roots for Reform; White House Using Internet Campaigns to Try
to Influence Health-Care Debate.” It details how Obama is going back
to the future, to try to gear up the “online world of grass-roots
activism” that was so important in his successful campaign “in an
attempt to reclaim control of the [health care] debate.”
The
difference is, of course, that his opponents, including pro-lifers,
learned from Obama’s brilliant presidential campaign. NRLC is
exponentially more effective in quickly countering the Obama message
machine and, thanks to your help via social networking (Facebook,
Twitter, etc.) in getting that information distributed to an
ever-growing network.
Keep
reading NRL News, my daily blog Today’s News & Views (www.nrlc.org),
and be sure to visit
www.nrlactioncenter.com daily. We need to be able to act just as
quickly and as universally as the pro-abortionists.
And if,
by chance, you should feel weary and wonder if you have the energy
for another pro-life effort, remember Chris’s words: “I’m here to
tell you that the prejudice and bias against unborn children by this
Administration is stunning. I’ve been in the Right to Life movement
for 37 years, and I’ve never seen an Administration so biased
against little kids.”
Please
send your thoughts on this or any other article in NRL News to
daveandrusko@gmail.com.
|