Today's News & Views

 


JUNE 2007
Vol. 34, No. 6


The imprint of the father remains forever in the life of the child

Happy Father's Day


House Joins Senate in Rejecting Limits on
Communications to Grassroots Public

WASHINGTON (May 29, 2007)—A coalition of groups, in which National Right to Life (NRLC) was a key participant, has been successful in blocking a push to enact a new federal law that would have regulated communications to the public about what is going on in Congress.

Since the new Democratic-controlled Congress convened in January, a coalition of liberal special-interest groups has urged Congress to pass a law to regulate “campaigns” of ads, mailings, phone calls, and other methods by which various organizations alert members of the public to legislation under consideration in Congress, and encourage them to express their opinions on a pending legislative matter—activities referred to by some as “grassroots lobbying.”

The groups pushing for such regulation include Common Cause, Democracy 21, Public Citizen, OMB Watch, the League of Women Voters, and others.

NRLC was joined by other groups, including the Family Research Council, the National Rifle Association, the American Center for Law and Justice, Focus on the Family, the Home School Legal Defense Association, the Free Speech Coalition, the American Civil Liberties Union, and many others, in opposing regulation of communications to grassroots citizens.

Continue article...
PDF version


Right of Older Americans to Add Own Money to
Get Unrationed Insurance in Medicare Faces Extinction

House Health Subcommittee Chair Pete Stark (D-Ca.), a vehement, longtime opponent of the right of older Americans to spend their own money to save their own lives, said at a May 21 hearing that Medicare private fee-for-service plans are at the “top of the list” of his targets this year.

Abby Block is director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Center for Beneficiary Choices. It is the official government agency that administers the Medicare private fee for service program. She was pushed to agree that price controls, in the form of required bureaucratic approval, should be imposed on the premiums charged by such plans. This would eliminate the central accomplishment the National Right to Life Committee fought so hard to achieve in 1995 through 2003.

Under the private fee-for-service plans option in Medicare, senior citizens can choose health insurance whose value is not limited by what the government may pay toward it. These plans currently can set premiums and reimbursement rates for providers without upward limits set by government regulation.

Continue article...
PDF version


 


ATTENTION:
Be a Part of the NRLC E-Mail List

www.nrlc.org/join_our_mailing_list.htm

Be a part of the National Right to Life E-mail List. We are sending out up-to-the-minute alerts that deal with pro-life legislation, breaking pro-life news, and much, much more.

This will not be a daily abortion update, but rather a way to bring crucial, time-sensitive material to our grassroots supporters.

So, don't delay and sign up today!!

The address again is
www.nrlc.org/join_our_mailing_list.htm


BULK SUBSCRIPTIONS
of NRL News are available!!!
Click here for details



|HOME - - www.nrlc.org|

Vol. 34, No. 6

 

From the President

Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

THE CONTINUING CONFUSION ABOUT ROE v. WADE
BY Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision to uphold the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act triggered several polls about the public’s opinion on Roe v. Wade. Of course, such polls have been around since 1973. If you carefully look at them, you conclude that while people have become more knowledgeable about—and opposed to—abortion itself, they are still quite ignorant about Roe v. Wade.

The arrival of prenatal ultrasound and the sustained educational campaigns of pro-lifers have refocused the public’s attention on the humanity of the unborn child and the brutal facts behind “choice.” Today, a pollster can ask a question about partial-birth abortions without having to describe the horrific details of the cruel procedure. People know what partial-birth abortions are and they oppose them: 72% think they should be illegal, according to the latest Gallup poll (May 10-13, 2007).

The public’s increasing unease with abortion is also evident in Gallup’s “pro-life/pro-choice” question. In a Gallup poll in September 1995—around the beginning of NRLC’s campaign to ban partial-birth abortions—33% of the public identified themselves as “pro-life,” while many more (56%) labeled themselves as “pro-choice.” In May 2007, Gallup’s numbers were 45% “pro-life” and 49% “pro-choice.” The labels “pro-life” and “pro-choice” are, however, quite imprecise.

Read Dr. Franz's Entire Column
PDF version


NRL News 2006 Subject Index



NRL News Archive

2007
January 2007

February 2007

March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007

2006
January 2006

February 2006
March 2006

April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006

December 2006

2005
January 2005

February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005

2004
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
J
une 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004

December 2004

2003
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003

2002
January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002

May 2002

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002

2001
January 2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
May 2001
June 2001
July 2001
August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001

2000
January 2000
February 2000
March 2000
April 2000
May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
December 2000

1999
January 22, 1999
February 19, 1999
March 15, 1999
April 8, 1999
May 11, 1999
June 10, 1999
July 6, 1999
August 10, 1999
September 14, 1999
October 12, 1999
November 1999
December 1999

1998
January 1998
February 11, 1998
March 11, 1998
April 14, 1998
May 7, 1998
July 8, 1998
June 9, 1998
August 12, 1998
September 28, 1998
October 12, 1998
November 17, 1998
December 10, 1998

1997
December 9, 1997


Subscribe Today to NRL News

Click here for ordering information