Today's News & Views

 


APRIL 2007
Vol. 34, No. 4



Fight over veto is near:
President and Congressional Democratic Leaders Face Off on Embryo-Killing Research

WASHINGTON (March 29, 2007)—During the second half of April, the leaders of the congressional Democratic majorities in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House intend to force a showdown with President Bush over legislation that would mandate federal funding for the kind of stem cell research that would require the killing of human embryos.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nv.) will bring the legislation to the Senate floor on April 10.

Reid is the chief sponsor of the Senate version (S. 5) of the bill that would overturn a policy adopted by President Bush in 2001, which prohibits federal funding of stem cell research that requires harming human embryos. The Reid bill would mandate federal funding of the type of stem cell research that requires the killing of human embryos in order to harvest their stem cells. The embryos would be those authorized by the parents to be “donated from in vitro fertilization clinics, [and that] were created for the purposes of fertility treatment.”

The Senate has agreed to spend 20 hours debating the issues surrounding stem cell research.

Continue article...
PDF version


Partisan Attacks on Private Fee-for-Service Plans Debunked

Editor’s note. On page one of the March issue of NRL News, we discussed how NRLC has long recognized that the involuntary denial of lifesaving medical treatment is a form of involuntary euthanasia. Therefore NRLC has opposed government rationing of health care. In 1997 and 2003, NRLC successfully fought to amend Medicare by allowing older people the right to use their own money to obtain unrationed care. Shockingly, under the new leadership of Congress that right is now at risk. Part of that attack is to attempt to demonize private fee-for-service Medicare. But keeping private fee-for-service Medicare is essential if ordinary citizens enrolled in Medicare are to obtain unrationed health insurance.

In a world of managed care and a declining number of providers willing to accept fee-for-service patients under the traditional government Medicare program, private fee-for-service Medicare plans provide a critically important mechanism through which older Americans can voluntarily add their own money to get unrationed health insurance. But if you read a spate of recent press attacks, you’d think these plans were nothing more than diabolical consumer frauds cooked up by profiteering insurance companies.

Continue article...
PDF version


 


ATTENTION:
Be a Part of the NRLC E-Mail List

www.nrlc.org/join_our_mailing_list.htm

Be a part of the National Right to Life E-mail List. We are sending out up-to-the-minute alerts that deal with pro-life legislation, breaking pro-life news, and much, much more.

This will not be a daily abortion update, but rather a way to bring crucial, time-sensitive material to our grassroots supporters.

So, don't delay and sign up today!!

The address again is
www.nrlc.org/join_our_mailing_list.htm


BULK SUBSCRIPTIONS
of NRL News are available!!!
Click here for details



|HOME - - www.nrlc.org|

Vol. 34, No. 4

 

From the President

Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

WHEN COMMON SENSE
IS LACKING
BY Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

Former Senator Alfonse D’Amato, the New York Republican, was first elected in 1980.  He was reelected in 1986 and in 1992.  Senator D’Amato managed to do this in liberal New York in spite of a solid pro-life record in the Senate: he voted pro-life 85 times on 89 roll calls.

When Senator D’Amato stood for reelection in 1998, he ran into opposition from some pro-lifers who considered him not pro-life enough or disliked him.  Some misguided pro-lifers actively worked against him, others simply refused to vote for him in the general election—it was a matter of “principle,” and Senator D’Amato didn’t match their notion of a pro-life candidate.

Senator D’Amato lost to a Democrat who had previously been in the House of Representatives where he (1) was a shrill promoter of abortion, (2) co-sponsored the infamous “Freedom of Choice Act” that would have established abortion on demand under a federal law, (3) co-sponsored the “Reproductive Health Equity Act” that would have required federal funding of all abortions in any federal program, and (4) had voted 97 out of 100 times for the pro-abortion side.  In other words, the Democratic candidate was the “ideal” pro-abortion candidate.  And his pro-abortion zeal was gratingly expressed: as one senator observed, “There is no more dangerous place than between Senator Schumer and a TV camera.”  Yes, we are talking about the very same Senator Chuck Schumer who now proudly basks in the glory of having organized the Democratic takeover of the Senate in the 2006 election.

Read Dr. Franz's Entire Column
PDF version


NRL News 2006 Subject Index



NRL News Archive

2007
January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

2006
January 2006

February 2006
March 2006

April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006

December 2006

2005
January 2005

February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005

2004
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
J
une 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004

December 2004

2003
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003

2002
January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002

May 2002

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002

2001
January 2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
May 2001
June 2001
July 2001
August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001

2000
January 2000
February 2000
March 2000
April 2000
May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
December 2000

1999
January 22, 1999
February 19, 1999
March 15, 1999
April 8, 1999
May 11, 1999
June 10, 1999
July 6, 1999
August 10, 1999
September 14, 1999
October 12, 1999
November 1999
December 1999

1998
January 1998
February 11, 1998
March 11, 1998
April 14, 1998
May 7, 1998
July 8, 1998
June 9, 1998
August 12, 1998
September 28, 1998
October 12, 1998
November 17, 1998
December 10, 1998

1997
December 9, 1997


Subscribe Today to NRL News

Click here for ordering information