Today's News & Views


Vol. 34, No. 2

Pro-Lifers Gather around the Nation to Commemorate 34th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade

Your Calls to Congress Needed Immediately
Health Care Rationing Looms;
Ability to Spend Own Money to Save Life in Danger
By Burke Balch, JD

Nine years after the pro-life movement won the ability of senior citizens to avoid rationing of lifesaving medical treatment, food, and fluids under Medicare, this right is under renewed attack by leaders in the new Congress.

At issue is the fundamental question of whether seniors will be prevented from using their own money, if they wish, to gain access to insurance that will not ration prescription drugs—or medical treatment.

A partial assault, already passed by the House and likely soon to come to a vote on the Senate floor, would limit the ability of older Americans to use their own funds to obtain innovative lifesaving drugs. A complete assault—to repeal the right entirely, as it applies to medical services as well as prescription drugs—has been promised by a key congressional leader and will likely be up for a vote later this year.

Why is NRLC involved? Since its inception, the National Right to Life Committee has been as concerned about protecting older people and those with disabilities from euthanasia as about protecting the unborn from abortion.

Continue article...
PDF version

President Vows Another Veto
Democratic Leaders Push Bill to Fund Embryo-Killing Research

WASHINGTON (January 31, 2007)—Only a week after taking control of the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate, Democratic leaders fast-tracked legislation that would mandate federal funding of the type of stem cell research that requires the killing of human embryos.

The legislation would overturn a policy adopted by President Bush in 2001, which prohibits federal funding of stem cell research that requires harming human embryos. (See related story, page 9.)

After Democrats took control of the House on January 4, one of their first legislative priorities was the bill to fund such research, authored by Representatives Diana DeGette (D-Co.) and Mike Castle (R-De.) (H.R. 3), which was brought to the House floor on January 11. The bill contains the same language as a bill that President Bush vetoed in July 2006—a veto that was sustained by the House. (See August 2006 NRL News, page 1.)

The bill would mandate federal funding of the type of stem cell research that requires the killing of human embryos in order to harvest their stem cells. The embryos would be those authorized by the parents to be “donated from in vitro fertilization clinics, [and that] were created for the purposes of fertility treatment.”

Continue article...
PDF version


Be a Part of the NRLC E-Mail List

Be a part of the National Right to Life E-mail List. We are sending out up-to-the-minute alerts that deal with pro-life legislation, breaking pro-life news, and much, much more.

This will not be a daily abortion update, but rather a way to bring crucial, time-sensitive material to our grassroots supporters.

So, don't delay and sign up today!!

The address again is

of NRL News are available!!!
Click here for details

|HOME - -|

Vol. 34, No. 2


From the President

Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

By Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

Pro-lifers rightly take satisfaction in the fact that abortion rates are down, that public support for unrestricted abortion has significantly declined, and that there is now majority support to severely restrict abortion or outlaw it altogether. We have made encouraging progress in our long campaign to secure the right to life for the child in the womb.

In fact, some have been so preoccupied working on behalf of the right to life of others, namely the unborn, that they have paid insufficient attention to the looming threat to our own right to life. This threat arises from demographic, political, and cul-tural trends that play into hands of those obsessed with “end of life solutions.”

The demographic trends are simply this: A tidal wave of “baby boomers” is approaching retirement. In 2005, the number of U.S. citizens 65 years of age or older was 36.8 million. In 2010, just three years from now, the number will be about 40.2 million. And in only eight years, in 2015, it will be 46.8 million. Not only will there be more elderly citizens than ever, they will also tend to live longer—albeit with frailties of varying degrees. From these trends it is obvious that a significant number of us will face disability and chronic medical conditions.

Read Dr. Franz's Entire Column
PDF version

NRL News 2006 Subject Index

NRL News Archive

January 2007

February 2007

January 2006

February 2006
March 2006

April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006

December 2006

January 2005

February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005

January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
une 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004

December 2004

January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003

January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002

May 2002

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002

January 2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
May 2001
June 2001
July 2001
August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001

January 2000
February 2000
March 2000
April 2000
May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
December 2000

January 22, 1999
February 19, 1999
March 15, 1999
April 8, 1999
May 11, 1999
June 10, 1999
July 6, 1999
August 10, 1999
September 14, 1999
October 12, 1999
November 1999
December 1999

January 1998
February 11, 1998
March 11, 1998
April 14, 1998
May 7, 1998
July 8, 1998
June 9, 1998
August 12, 1998
September 28, 1998
October 12, 1998
November 17, 1998
December 10, 1998

December 9, 1997

Subscribe Today to NRL News

Click here for ordering information