Today's News & Views


NOVEMBER 2006
Vol. 33, No. 11


Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Challenges to Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act


Election Night Results and the Pro-Life “Increment”
By David N. O’Steen, Ph.D.

Although the overall election results November 7 were very disappointing, polling clearly demonstrates that many pro-life candidates who otherwise would have been defeated prevailed because of their position on the abortion issue. As has been the case in election after election since 1973, election eve and post-election polling showed that the majority of those who voted on the basis of abortion voted for pro-life candidates. This difference between those who vote for pro-life candidate because of the abortion issue and those who for pro-abortion candidates is known as the pro-life “increment.”

Unfortunately, this pro-life increment was not enough to save other pro-life Republicans who were swept away by the larger anti-Republican tide.

National Right to Life PAC was active and highly visible. As a testimony to the hard work and reach of NRL PAC, a nationwide poll of 800 voters taken by The Polling Company found that fully 22% of voters said that they recalled hearing advertising or receiving information from National Right to Life PAC.

The Polling Company also found that 36% of the voters said abortion affected their vote. Of those, 23% said they voted for pro-life candidates while only 13% said they voted for pro-abortion candidates. This yielded a significant advantage for pro-life candidates in contest after contest.

Continue article...


Giving the Gift of Life
BY Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

Charitable giving is always first about making a difference. For example, when you give to National Right to Life, you’re making a difference by saving lives.

Give the Gift of Life

Give the Gift of Love

But there are other benefits to charitable giving. Being part of a great movement, feeling positive about helping others live—these are wonderful benefits you get when you contribute.

But there’s another benefit—financial. That’s right, the tax code has been shaped to encourage charitable giving. The value of some of the donations you give can be subtracted from your gross income at tax time, so you pay taxes on a lower net income.
 

In other words, a charitable gift can help decrease the taxes you pay.

The National Right to Life Educational Trust Fund has a special purpose. Its role is to educate citizens about the life issues. Because it only does educational work, donations to the National Right to Life Educational Trust Fund are fully deductible for federal income tax purposes.

While our need for financial support is usually greater in the non-deductible National Right to Life Committee fund (non-deductible because the Committee lobbies to change the law), we recognize that toward the end of the year, many of our members are interested in making a charitable contribution to the NRL Educational Trust Fund, so they can benefit from tax-deductibility.

Continue article...



ATTENTION:
Be a Part of the NRLC E-Mail List

www.nrlc.org/join_our_mailing_list.htm

Be a part of the National Right to Life E-mail List. We are sending out up-to-the-minute alerts that deal with pro-life legislation, breaking pro-life news, and much, much more.

This will not be a daily abortion update, but rather a way to bring crucial, time-sensitive material to our grassroots supporters.

So, don't delay and sign up today!!

The address again is
www.nrlc.org/join_our_mailing_list.htm


BULK SUBSCRIPTIONS
of NRL News are available!!!
Click here for details



|HOME - - www.nrlc.org|

Vol. 33, No. 11

 

From the President

Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

ONWARD, PRO-LIFE SOLDIERS!
By Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

It is the days after the election.  The Senate and the House of Representatives are under the control of pro-abortion Democrats.  And the Democratic Speaker of the House declares confidently on TV that the passage of the “Freedom of Choice Act” (FOCA) in the next congressional term is “a done deal.”  Worse, the president promises to sign the “Freedom of Choice Act…”  But wait, that was the election of 1992.

After the 1992 election, pro-lifers faced the pro-abortion leadership’s trifecta: Bill Clinton, the nation’s first openly pro-abortion president; George Mitchell, the pro-abortion Democratic Majority Leader in the Senate; and Tom Foley, the pro-abortion Democratic Speaker of the House, who so confidently predicted the passage of the infernal FOCA bill.

The “Freedom of Choice Act” would have made unlimited abortion on demand a federal right—properly enacted by Congress and signed by the president.  Charges that a phony “right” had been extra-constitutionally imposed by the Supreme Court’s “legislating from the bench” in 1973 would have been moot.  With the FOCA passed, it would have been all nice and legal, because “the people” would have spoken through their senators and representatives.  And that would have been that.  Except, it wasn‘t.

The FOCA never passed.  And in 1994, Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell abandoned his senatorial career, and Speaker Tom Foley lost his bid for re-election—“the first time a House speaker had been defeated in his home district since … 1862” (The Almanac of American Politics - 2004).

Read Dr. Franz's Entire Column

PDF version


NRL News 2006 Subject Index



NRL News Archive

2006
January 2006

February 2006
March 2006

April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006

2005
January 2005

February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005

2004
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
J
une 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004

December 2004

2003
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003

2002
January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002

May 2002

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002

2001
January 2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
May 2001
June 2001
July 2001
August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001

2000
January 2000
February 2000
March 2000
April 2000
May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
December 2000

1999
January 22, 1999
February 19, 1999
March 15, 1999
April 8, 1999
May 11, 1999
June 10, 1999
July 6, 1999
August 10, 1999
September 14, 1999
October 12, 1999
November 1999
December 1999

1998
January 1998
February 11, 1998
March 11, 1998
April 14, 1998
May 7, 1998
July 8, 1998
June 9, 1998
August 12, 1998
September 28, 1998
October 12, 1998
November 17, 1998
December 10, 1998

1997
December 9, 1997


Subscribe Today to NRL News

Click here for ordering information