Today's News & Views

 

JANUARY 2006
Vol. 33, No. 1


Law Will Expand Availability of
Umbilical Cord Blood for Treatments

BY Liz Townsend


President George Bush shakes hands with pro-life Congressman Chris Smith (R-NJ) after signing the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act at the White House.

The use of umbilical cord blood stem cells to treat and cure many diseases will be enhanced by the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act, passed by Congress after a seven-month delay and signed by President George W. Bush December 20.

"Not only has God in His infinite wisdom and goodness created the placenta and umbilical cord to nurture and protect the precious life of an unborn child," said bill sponsor Rep. Christopher Smith (R-N.J.), "but now we know that another gift awaits us immediately after birth, something very special left behind--cord blood that is rich with stem cells."

The act will provide $79 million to obtain 150,000 more units of cord blood, which is expected to help treat up to 90% of patients who need the versatile cells. The blood is derived directly from placentas and umbilical cords donated by parents after their babies' birth, without harming the donor.

Cord blood stem cells have been used to treat thousands of patients suffering from more than 60 different diseases, including leukemia, Hodgkin's Disease, sickle cell disease, and thalassemia. Researchers also theorize that they may have the capacity to differentiate into other cell types, making them useful in the exploration of ethical stem cell therapies for even more diseases.

Continue article...


Cloning Researcher Accused
of Falsifying Evidence

BY Liz Townsend

South Korea's Hwang Woo-suk answering questions at a press conference where he announced his resignation as head of the World Stem Cell Hub.

Embryonic stem cell research proponents are reeling in the wake of allegations that their most prominent and celebrated researcher, South Korea's Hwang Woo-suk, fabricated evidence and violated fundamental scientific procedures, calling into question all of his reported breakthroughs that have provided some of the few "successes" in the field.

Hwang has admitted to lying about the source of human eggs used in his research, while experts are questioning his claims of creating the first stem cell lines from cloned embryos that genetically match their donors, the first cloned embryo, and the first cloned dog.

Hwang resigned as head of the World Stem Cell Hub and other government-funded stem cell research agencies November 24 after confirming that he used eggs donated by his research assistants, a violation of international research protocol.

The scandal has prompted some of the first negative reports about human cloning and embryo experimentation from the mainstream media. Accounts typically report any alleged "breakthroughs" in awe-filled tones, completely ignoring the immorality of creating designer human beings and then killing them for their stem cells.

Continue article...



The above articles require Adobe Acrobat Reader.  If you do not have Adobe Acrobat Reader, please click on the button for the free download. 

The articles below are in HTML format.

 


ATTENTION:
Be a Part of the NRLC E-Mail List

www.nrlc.org/join_our_mailing_list.htm

Be a part of the National Right to Life E-mail List. We are sending out up-to-the-minute alerts that deal with pro-life legislation, breaking pro-life news, and much, much more.

This will not be a daily abortion update, but rather a way to bring crucial, time-sensitive material to our grassroots supporters.

So, don't delay and sign up today!!

The address again is
www.nrlc.org/join_our_mailing_list.htm


BULK SUBSCRIPTIONS
of NRL News are available!!!
Click here for details



|HOME - - www.nrlc.org|

Vol. 33, No. 1

 

 

From the President

Wanda Franz, Ph.D.

PUBLIC CONFUSION ABOUT ROE v. WADE AND
DOE v. BOLTON


n The 1973 decision [of Roe v. Wade] is so ingrained in public consciousness that most people can recognize the case by its name. [Emphasis added.]
—Knight Ridder news story, 12/31/05

n Most women in the survey could not name the case that prompted the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision legalizing the right to abortion in the United States. Forty-three percent correctly identified the case as “Roe v. Wade” (or came close to offering the exact name), 2% gave some other name, and 55% admitted outright that they did not know the name of the case.…
Half of women (51%) now say they would like to see very strict limits on abortion—34% who think it should only be permitted in cases of rape, incest and to save the woman’s life and 17% who think abortion should never be permitted. Two years ago, 45% of women preferred either of these two kinds of very strict limitation on abortion. [Emphasis added.]
—Poll for the Center for Gender Equality by Princeton Survey Research Associates, 4/7/03

n “In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that states laws which made it illegal for a woman to have an abortion up to three months of pregnancy were un-constitutional, and that the decision on whether a woman should have an abortion up to three months of pregnancy should be left to the woman and her doctor to decide. In general, do you favor or oppose this part of the U.S. Supreme Court decision making abortions up to three months of pregnancy legal?” (Emphasis added to highlight misrepresentation.) Poll result: Favor 52%, oppose 47% [highest in 20 years].
—Harris Poll question used since 1973 (!), data from 3/3/05

Read Dr. Franz's Entire Column


Complete NRL News
2005 Subject Index



NRL News Archive

2005
January 2005

February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005

2004
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
J
une 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004

December 2004

2003
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003

2002
January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002

May 2002

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002

2001
January 2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
May 2001
June 2001
July 2001
August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001

2000
January 2000
February 2000
March 2000
April 2000
May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
December 2000

1999
January 22, 1999
February 19, 1999
March 15, 1999
April 8, 1999
May 11, 1999
June 10, 1999
July 6, 1999
August 10, 1999
September 14, 1999
October 12, 1999
November 1999
December 1999

1998
January 1998
February 11, 1998
March 11, 1998
April 14, 1998
May 7, 1998
July 8, 1998
June 9, 1998
August 12, 1998
September 28, 1998
October 12, 1998
November 17, 1998
December 10, 1998

1997
December 9, 1997


Subscribe Today to NRL News

Click here for ordering information