Reflections on the Tenth
Anniversary of the Approval of RU486
Part Two of Two
By Dave Andrusko
Over
the last fifteen years, I venture to say no publication has
written as extensively and exhaustingly on this two-drug
abortifacient technique as National Right to Life News. Most of
that investigative work on RU486 has been complied by Dr.
Randall K. O'Bannon, NRLC's director of education.
Later this week and more
extensively in the October issue of NRL News, Dr. O'Bannon will
give us an overview of the deaths of almost a million and a half
unborn babies which followed U.S. approval of RU 486--hastened
along by the zealous corner-cutting of the administration of
pro-abortion President Bill Clinton. Although this gets ignored
or trivialized, at least eight women who took RU 486 have died
in the United States and many more abroad.
I will offer a few
comments here, partly derived from an Associated Press story by
David Crary, titled "After 10 years in US, abortion pill still
divisive."
Led by NRLC pro-life
forces valiantly fought an all-out campaign to keep RU486 (now
known commercially as Mifeprex) out of the U.S. Since FDA
approved its use in September 2000, Crary says that 1.4 million
women have used it.
The use of RU486 has grown
markedly and shows no signs of abating. We've written several
stories about what Crary calls "a pioneering telemedicine
program in Iowa" which "has provided the pill to about 1,900
women - with a doctor able to consult with a faraway patient in
a video teleconference, then unlock a container by remote
control to release the pill." (To be more specific inside is the
abortifacient RU486 and the powerful prostaglandin misoprostol
which stimulates the contractions needed to expel the tiny
corpse.) This is a nightmare come true, offering the possibility
of women self-administering a chemically-induced abortions
hundreds of miles away from the abortionist who has asked her a
few perfunctory questions.
The plague promises to
spread. "'There are many affiliates that are carefully
considering this option, within the confines of their state
laws,' said Dr. Vanessa Cullins, vice president for medical
affairs of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the
nation's leading abortion provider," according to Crary.
"Mifeprex now accounts for
about one-quarter of U.S. abortions performed in the first nine
weeks of pregnancy and about 15 percent of all U.S. abortions,"
Crary writes. "In 2008, about 184,000 American women used the
pill - up from 55,000 in 2001 even though the overall number of
U.S. abortions wasn't rising." In addition, "Ten years ago,
Planned Parenthood offered surgical abortions at 151 sites,
according Cullins; now the organization has 322 centers
providing abortion - nearly half of them relatively small
clinics that offer the pill but not surgery."
The dangers continue to
underestimated, especially "tele-abortions." As Dr. O'Bannon
wrote earlier this month, "When these pills 'work,' they do not
simply target the unborn child, but also the woman's
reproductive and other systems. They initiate copious bleeding,
painful cramps, and often nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Some
women have experienced heart palpitations, drops in blood
pressure, dizziness. A number of women do not abort or do not
have a complete abortion, requiring some surgical intervention.
"Women given RU486," he
concluded, "need to be closely monitored and they need to have
medical help close at hand, not hundreds of miles away."
Please send your
comments on Today's News & Views and National Right to Life News
Today to
daveandrusko@gmail.com. If you like, join those who are
following me on Twitter at
http://twitter.com/daveha.
Part Three
Part One |