"The Gravest Problem… is the
Basic Denial to Girls of Life Itself"
Part Two of TwoBy
Dave Andrusko
Editor's note. If you'd
like, follow me on
www.twitter.com/daveha.
Many is the time I've wondered
out loud--and in complete sincerity--how
pro-abortion feminists can not be up in arms
over sex-selection abortions and infanticide
when the victims are almost always females. This
would seem to be a no-brainer, even for the most
militant.
I happened across a recent
Washington Post review of a new book, "Half the
Sky: Turning Oppression Into Opportunity for
Women Worldwide." The reviewer is Prof. Martha
Nussbaum, who is famous for many things, but for
our purposes as a signer of the bogus
"Historian's Brief" sent to the Supreme Court as
a "friend of the court brief" in the 1989
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services abortion
case.
Although the 281 professional
historians, including Nussbaum, did acknowledge
that "physicians were the principal
nineteenth-century proponents of laws to
restrict abortion," they firmly denied the
transparently obvious--that concern for the
unborn was one of the physicians' reasons! Among
other faulty arguments, the brief also asserted
that the life of the unborn child "became a
central issue in American culture only in the
late twentieth century."
I mention that to make clear
that Nussbaum's pro-abortion credentials are in
order.
Her Post review critiques many
areas far out of my expertise, including a
judgment of which regions of the globe are most
oppressive to women--and why. Nussbaum has lots
of good things to say about authors, the
husband-and-wife team of Nicholas D. Kristof and
Sheryl WuDunn, but her review is hardly
uncritical.
From our single-issue
perspective the most important criticism is
found in the following two paragraphs.
"The gravest problem, one that
the authors mention but never treat in detail,
is the basic denial to girls of life itself,
whether through infanticide, discriminatory
nutrition and health care in childhood, or the
increasingly common practice of sex-selective
abortion. Here the nations of East Asia leap
into prominence. The natural ratio of girls to
boys at birth is typically taken to be 95 to
100. In Singapore and Taiwan, the figure is 92
girls to 100 boys, in South Korea 88, in China
only 86.
"These figures reflect only
sex-selective abortion, and not deaths after
birth from infanticide or differential nutrition
and medical care. The overall sex ratio, which
does include these deaths, is even more
striking: China and South Korea have two of the
most unbalanced sex ratios in the world."
Devastating numbers like this
do make it into the popular press on occasion,
but often in the context (explicit or implicit)
of "well, that's the way it is in those
cultures." Here Nussbaum cuts right to the
chase. There are many horrific discriminatory
practices women face around the world, none of
which are unimportant, but the gravest is "the
basic denial to girls of life itself." |