Bookmark and Share  
 
Today's News & Views
October 21, 2009
 

We Refuse to be Marginalized
Part Three of Three

By Dave Andrusko

Part Three is a smorgasbord of several items that are important for our audience to know about.

#1. Last week, Time magazine's Amy Sullivan unleashed her latest pro-abortion salvo, this time aimed at the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Her litany is so wrong on so many different fronts that the only explanation is that she must have composed her column from notes handed to her by the pro-abortion Obama Administration.

In many ways the most important part of this assault is how it is part of the daily offensive undertaken by Obama and his allies to marginalize anyone who has the audacity to disagree. Wherever you might be on the political spectrum, whatever your position on abortion, this ought to make you very, very afraid.

NRLC Legislative Director Douglas Johnson and Richard Doerflinger, Deputy Director of the Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, have responded thoughtfully.  Let me offer the first paragraph of Mr. Johnson's rebuttal:

"From my perspective as legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), about the only thing that is "revealing" about the latest essay by Time magazine's Amy Sullivan is how hard she works to assist the Administration and its congressional allies as they press forward with another key element in the pro-abortion public policy agenda. In this case, the end goal of the pro-abortion forces is to establish two big new federal programs that will subsidize abortion on demand, by smuggling these programs into law through the "health care reform" legislation. The immediate goal of Sullivan's latest essay is to try to sow confusion regarding the efforts of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops to prevent the enactment of those pro-abortion policies."

#2. It is no secret that the Obama Administration has taken dead aim both at Fox News and at conservative talk radio. And it is no surprise that CNN, which is getting shellacked in the ratings by Fox News, should decide it was time for a three-part series on talk radio.

Wesley Smith

Why is this important to us? Because both Fox and conservative talk radio are among the few media outlets that give the pro-life perspective a fair hearing. Attacks by the Obama Administration and its media lackeys (such as CNN) are intended not just to stifle criticism. It is also to set the stage for either reinstituting the "Fairness Doctrine" or some other mechanism to emasculate the few media voices that do not kowtow to Obama.

A friend sent me a link to the first part of the CNN series. It is hard to miss the message.

"Some say" (always a bad start) that conservative talk radio "has made our country viciously partisan."  As for listeners of conservative talk radio, according to Carol Costello, they are the kind of people who, if they cannot be institutionalized, need at a minimum to be psychoanalyzed on a regular basis.

#3. In Part Two, the final link is to a piece written by bioethicist Wesley Smith that appears at http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MzVjMTU3ZGE2MDVkM2ZjMTg1YTY3NDIwYjdmOWZmYTE=.

"Hazardous Pathway: The road to euthanasia" is must reading. Its thesis is, "The United Kingdom continues to provide vivid warnings about the dangers of centralized health-care planning-- a real possibility under Obamacare." Smith then offers a litany of examples to prove his point.

Smith concludes with this warning:

"Chillingly, current Obamacare plans call for the creation of many cost/benefit/best-practices boards, the full power of which won't be fully known until the bureaucrats promulgate tens of thousands of pages of regulations between now and 2013, when the law would go into effect. Making matters more alarming, these boards would not only govern treatment provided in any public-option health plan, but would also be empowered to set the standards of care paid for by private insurance. Unless the final version of Obamacare is amended explicitly to prohibit such centralized health planning, don't be surprised if an American version of the Liverpool Care Pathway comes soon to a hospital or nursing home near you."

Please send your comments to daveandrusko@gmail.com