|
The Context of Tonight's Final Presidential
Debate -- Part One of Three
Editor's note. Parts
two and
three
track down PPFA's money trail and the huge revenue that goes
into its coffers from abortion. Please send me your thoughts at
daveandrusko@hotmail.com.
I hope you have a chance to watch the third
and final debate tonight between pro-life Sen. John McCain and
pro-abortion Sen. Barack Obama. Let me offer four thoughts on
the debate, moderated by CBS's Bob Schieffer, that is supposed
to focus entirely on the economy and domestic policy.
#1. I don't pretend to great expertise
on the current economic turmoil. It seems clear, however, that
for whatever reason, or combination of reasons, the setbacks in
the markets have stymied Sen. McCain's comeback. Given Sen.
Obama's gargantuan financial advantage, tonight is likely Sen.
McCain's best opportunity to make the case that his is the hand
the public wants at the helm during these turbulent times.
#2. As we have noted many times in this
space, the elephant in the room--the topic that everyone knows
is there but is not acknowledged--is abortion. We can hope that
Sen. McCain is able to steer the discussion to Sen. Obama's
opposition to the kind of limitations the vast majority of
Americans support. That would include everything from parental
involvement, to women's right to know laws, to not using
taxpayer dollars to pay for abortions, to Obama's
straightforward opposition to a ban on partial-birth abortion.
All of these popular (and highly effective) limitations would be
smashed to smithereens if the steamroller known as the "Freedom
of Choice Act" is passed. Obama is a FOCA co-sponsor. If people
are pleased that the number of abortions dropped 8% between 2000
and 2005, they should know that FOCA would reverse that trend
almost immediately.
#3. Like me, most of you have read
articles (some of them may actually be sincere) in which
commentators angrily denounce anger expressed against the media
by McCain supporters at various rallies. At this point, you
don't know whether to laugh or cry.
I've watched this annual ritual intently since
1980. Most of the media does everything in its collective power
to sabotage the pro-life candidate and make smooth the path of
the pro-abortion candidate and then is astonished that people
feel outraged. There is an inverse correlation between media
bias and its willingness to acknowledge their irresponsibility.
The more incredibly one-sided they are--and the "mainstream
media's" tilt toward Obama is astonishingly blatant--the less
they will examine their own behavior, preferring to attribute
bad motives to those who are naïve enough to believe that the
media is supposed to be relatively even-handed.
#4. As we enter the last three weeks,
there are very few polls you can count on to be accurate. I read
a fascinating piece this morning the gist of which is at the
very end most polls will wind up predicting an outcome
reasonably close to what actually occurs. But along the way the
performance of the polls will vary wildly. It is impossible not
to draw the conclusion that some of them have an agenda: depress
the turnout for the candidate they want to lose. In this case
Sen. McCain.
One of those reliable presidential tracking
polls is the Rasmussen Report. In today's edition, it reported
Obama up on McCain, 50% to 45%. However, there are these two
very important paragraphs:
"Overall, 12% of voters remain persuadables
who favor one candidate or the other but could change their
mind. Those, plus the 3% who remain undecided, are the target
audience for both candidates in tonight's debate.
"Fifty percent (50%) of these target voters
say the economy is the top issue of Election 2008. That is
similar to the overall perceptions of voters. However, while
national security matters are second on the list for all voters,
the persuadables have less interest in that topic--13% say that
cultural issues are their highest priority, 13% name fiscal
issues as number one and 11% see national security as most
important. Only 5% of persuadables are most interested in
domestic issues such as health care and social security."
In other words nearly one voter in eight says
they could change their mind and 3% remain undecided. (My guess
is that 3% may understate the situation.) While half say the
economy is their top issue, 13% say "cultural issues" –the most
prominent of which we know is abortion--are their highest
priority.
As I have written for months, even at this
late date, some percentage of Americans still do not know that
Barack Obama is the Abortion Establishment's Alpha and Omega,
the guy who promises to give them everything they want, and
more. Likewise, John McCain's strong pro-life record on abortion
is not known to everyone.
Be sure to do everything you can to educate
the American public. You can download a comparison flyer by
going to
http://nrlc.org/Election2008/comparison0909084c.pdf.
Part Two
--
Following the
PPFA Money Trail
Part Three
-- PPFA Money Factsheet |