A Cautionary Tale About "Living
Wills"
-- Part
One of
Two
The headline on the op-ed in
Sunday's Washington Post accurately
caught the author's sentiments:
"BACK OFF! I'M NOT DEAD YET. I Don't Want
a Living Will. Why Should I?" [www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101201882.html]
Charlotte Allen is someone who I
have read with delight for many years. She is a
gifted journalist and author, with a flair for
not being flamboyant. Wherever/whenever her
essays appear, the reader knows he is in for a
treat.
The inspiration for Ms. Allen's
very thoughtful and provocative 1,706-word-long
op-ed was a trip she made last year to a
hospital. She'd come in for treatment of an
early-stage breast cancer, which is, as she
explained, "noninvasive and thus not
particularly life-threatening if promptly
attended to, and the required outpatient surgery
isn't especially risky."
But "one of the shoals I had to
maneuver through at the hospital (which
otherwise afforded me excellent care) was a
series of efforts to persuade me to sign on to
the currently fashionable notion of a 'good
death.'" That would be signing a "living will."
The premise, unspoken or
otherwise, of such wills is the exact opposite
of NRLC's Will to Live. A Will to Live
emphasizes what the person does want done on
their behalf.
By contrast, generally a living
will tells the staff in excruciating detail what
they supposedly don't want done. That, of
course, is the rub.
When the rubber hits the
road--when individuals are dealing with concrete
medical emergencies--people often let staff know
they now want what they previously said they
didn't want in their living will.
And that doesn't address the
less-than-subtle coercive power of a document
that is not only embedded with don't- treat-me
assumptions, but is also a complex document
which (as Allen notes) "cast[s] a negative pall
upon positive efforts to keep me alive."
All this, expected to be
completed in about in about 30 seconds, "did not
inspire my confidence in the living-will
industry."
The first time Allen was asked if
she'd signed a living will, "I found the box on
the form that said 'I decline a living will' and
checked it. Right now, my husband is my living
will, and after we spent 13 days observing Terri
Schiavo exercise her 'right to die' by being
slowly dehydrated to death after her feeding
tube was removed in 2005, he knows exactly how I
feel about such matters."
Twice more she was asked the same
question. This got Allen to pondering the big
questions, including how much is hidden in gauzy
talk about a "good death/dying well."
This is a long quote, but a good
one from Ms. Allen,
"In fact, when I contemplate the
concept of 'dying well,' I can't avoid the
uneasy feeling that it actually means 'dying
when we, the intellectual elite, think it is
appropriate for you to die.' Consider what's
happened in recent years: The classic
Hippocratic Oath and its prohibition against
physicians giving people a 'deadly drug' has
collapsed with the growing acceptance of such
notions as physician-assisted suicide, the
'right to die,' and even giving some very sick,
disabled or demented people a little push over
the edge, as seems to be the case in the
Netherlands. People facing end-of-life decisions
may well feel subtle pressure from the medical
and bioethical establishments to make the choice
that will save the most money, as well as spare
their relatives and society at large the burden
of their continued existence."
She concludes this with "A 'good
death'-- that's the English translation of the
Greek word that begins with an 'e' You know,
euthanasia."
The medical establishment is more
aggressive than ever in pushing living wills so
as to limit care--supposedly at the "end of
life" but often earlier and for very nebulous
reasons.
"In other
words," Allen writes, "the whole point of a
living will is to allow medical personnel
not
to resuscitate or to deny 'artificial' food,
water, and breathing assistance."
If you go to NRLC's web page, you
can download a Will to Live.
www.nrlc.org/euthanasia/willtolive/index.html.
I would strongly advise you to do
so.
Please send your comments to Dave
Andrusko at
daveandrusko@hotmail.com.
Part Two