An Electoral Dead-End
Part Two of Three
By Dave Andrusko
In a passing comment in
Part One, I mentioned that
pro-abortionists are consoling themselves with the
illusion/delusion that if only, ONLY Democratic candidates had
promoted abortion more, their mid-term losses would have
been…something…fewer, I guess.
Judging
by his approach, Los Angeles Times columnist Tim Rutten is
hardly one of us. But his column, "Will abortion be an issue
again?" does a very good job of debunking the notion that
Democrats would be better off (paraphrasing "a number of
longtime activists") if the party were to "reassert more clearly
and forcefully its commitment to reproductive rights."
Rutten's response cuts
right to the chase. "In the Democrats' case, though, it's hard
to imagine anything more ill-timed than an attempt to revive
abortion as an electoral wedge issue." He lists several
inter-related reasons, the common thread of which is this won't
work with Catholics and/or with the leadership of the Catholic
Church.
1.Referring especially to
voters in Rust Belt states ("where Democrats suffered dramatic
reversals"), Rutten writes, "For four decades, no presidential
candidate has won the popular vote without carrying Catholics.
Making support for access to abortion a litmus test ignores that
historical calculus."
2.He cites the selection
of Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York to be the new President
of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. "Dolan is
regarded as an articulate advocate for asserting the church's
opposition to abortion ahead of any other issue," Rutten says.
3.True or not ( I have no
idea), Rutten writes that many of the Bishops who voted for
Archbishop Dolan over Bishop Gerald Kicanas of Tucson agree with
"Denver's Archbishop Charles Chaput and soon-to-be curial
Cardinal Raymond Burke that Catholics who hold positions
favoring abortion rights … ought to be denied communion."
Much of the remainder of
the column is saturated in hyperbole from critics of these three
men. But that does not change Rutten's bottom line. Regardless
of what NARAL and Planned Parenthood tell the Los Angeles Times,
the New York Times, The Washington Post, and POLITICO, an even
firmer embrace of abortion is an electoral dead-end for
Democrats.
Please send your
comments on Today's News & Views and National Right to Life News
Today to
daveandrusko@gmail.com. If you like, join those who are
following me on Twitter at
http://twitter.com/daveha.
Part Three
Part One |