The Day After the Day After
Part One of FourBy Dave
Andrusko
Good evening, and thanks for taking
time to read Today's News & Views. We continue to have lots to say about
Tuesday's elections. Part Two talks about
an amazing press conference President Obama gave yesterday. Parts
Three and Four
are expressions of gratitude from NRLC. Over at National Right to Life News
Today (www.nationalrighttolifenews.org),
another thank you; a great explanation of ObamaCare and rationing; and one
more look at Tuesday's results. Please send your comments on Today's News &
Views and National Right to Life News Today to
daveandrusko@gmail.com. If you
like, join those who are following me on Twitter at
http://twitter.com/daveha.
"I think we'd be misreading the
election if we thought that the American people want to see us for the next
two years re-litigate arguments that we had over the last two years."
-- President Barack Obama, at his Wednesday press
conference.
 |
|
President
Obama at his Wednesday news conference. |
As remarkable--and remarkably
positive--as the results from Tuesday's elections were, they came as little
surprise to most anyone who's been watching the public's mounting opposition
to all things Obama. But as you watched (or, in my case, listened) to
pro-abortion President Barack Obama's press conference, it was clear that he
was clueless. He wasn't feigning ignorance, he really did not see it coming.
Okay, if true, what difference does
that make? Let me suggest a couple of possibilities.
Go back to the quote that begins this
blog. Even judged on Obama's scale of arrogance, this was a pip.
Take any poll you want, and the
message going in and coming out was unmistakable: the public firmly believes
that Obama dramatically overshot whatever mandate he may have been given.
But according to the President, we're "misreading the election" if
pro-lifers (for example) attempt to "re-litigate" (roll back) ObamaCare.
There were questions specifically
about health care and compromising with Republicans, many of whom ran on the
platform of deep-sixing ObamaCare.
Sure, they could compromise, Obama
responded brightly. Together they could figure out ways to implement
ObamaCare faster! (I kid you not.)
Time after time, question after
question, Obama responded with canned answers--which is fine. But they bore
no relationship to reality. Zippo.
Dana Milbank is a reliable Obamaphile
for the Washington Post, but even he balked on the nonsense that Obama
distributed freely.
"What failures he did admit were those
of tactics and communications," Milbank wrote. "It's not that he has
poisonous relations with business, he said, but that he needs to do better
at 'setting the right tone publicly.' It's not that his economic policies
were flawed, he said, but that people 'don't see' the progress."
In many ways Obama's answer to Peter
Baker of the New York Times was the most telling of all. So where would you
looking to compromise with Republicans?
"I've been willing to compromise in
the past, and I'm going to be willing to compromise going forward," the
president responded, fingers tightly crossed behind his back.
Why is that important? For two
reasons. First, because everything Obama said yesterday pointed in one
direction--he and/or his policies had not been rebuked by voters and what
problems he did have were in "messaging." (Failures in "messaging" is the
last resort of a failing presidency.)
Second, this pretense that he already
HAS been working like a dog to find "common ground" with Republicans is a
prelude to what we will hear when people like pro-life House
Speaker-designate John Boehner (see Part Two) begin to topple ObamaCare by
whittling away at it. Obama will tell us that he is burning the midnight oil
seeking, in vain, to accommodate those rascally Republicans.
The POLITICO has a story this morning,
the gist of which is that while Obama talks about the dangers of living in a
"bubble," according to aides and former aides he's already in one. By that
they mean a handful of aides, operating in an "ill-defined chain of command
in the West Wing that concentrates too much power in too few hands," made
worse by "a surplus of West Wingers who spin out ideas by the bushel -- and
a shortage of seasoned middle managers to execute and sell them."
But this, of course, is just another
variation on the same excusatory theme. The ideas and agenda are just hunky
dory. With a few more veteran operatives (aka salesmen), they'll captivate
the electorate and steamroll the opposition.
Nothing could be further from the
truth. President Obama and ObamaCare were massively repudiated Tuesday. And
it's because we know that--and the pro-life Republican leadership knows
that--we are looking forward to reversing what Rep. Boehner rightly calls
the "monstrosity" that is ObamaCare.
Part
Two
Part Three
Part Four |