|
"I Guess I Should Have
Known Better" -- Part
Two of Two
Editor's note. Please send your thoughts to
daveandrusko@hotmail.com. They are important feedback.
Along with many, many
others, I tried for the better part of two years to figure out
what makes now President-elect Barack Obama tick. Or, perhaps
better put, to grasp what it is that so many millions of
Americans see in a man who, experience-wise, is so thin you
would think everyone could see right through him.
Syndicated columnist and
author Mark Steyn is, in my judgment, the finest opinion writer
in North America. Over the weekend he penned a column that
captured what I had so inadequately tried to say.
As he often does, Steyn
begins with a hilarious vignette to make a serious point.
"In Tokyo last week," he
writes, "over 1,000 people signed a new petition asking the
Japanese government to permit marriages between human beings and
cartoon characters. 'I am no longer interested in three
dimensions. I would even like to become a resident of the
two-dimensional world,' explained Taichi Takashita. 'Therefore,
at the very least, would it be possible to legally authorize
marriage with a two-dimensional character?'
"Get back to me on that
Tuesday night," Steyn continued. "We'll know by then whether an
entire constitutional republic has decided to contract marriage
with a two-dimensional character and to attempt to take up
residence in the two-dimensional world."
While writing
tongue-in-cheek, Steyn is making a profoundly insightful
observation. Millions of America last night voted for "the
two-dimensional Obama --the image, the idea, the 'hope,'" he
wrote, but "it will be the three-dimensional Obama –-the real
man with the real record--that America will have to live with."
Let me offer a few concrete examples.
The two-dimensional Obama
tells us he is a non-partisan, reach-across-the-political-aisle
sort of guy. The three-dimensional Obama is as partisan as
pro-abortion Sens. Charles Schumer and Dick Durban, only not as
outwardly vicious.
The two-dimensional Obama
says in a debate, "But there surely is some common ground when
both those who believe in choice and those who are opposed to
abortion can come together" -- for example, by "helping single
mothers if they want to choose to keep the baby." The three
dimensional Obama advocates cutting off all federal aid to
crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs).
The two-dimensional Obama
assures the public his goal is to "reduce the number of
abortions."
The three-dimensional
Obama has vowed to Planned Parenthood the first thing he will do
as President is sign a bill that is guaranteed to multiple the
number of abortions by a huge amount and to throttle any notion
of a conscience clause. Waving The "Freedom of Choice Act"
before the anti-life set is like promising an addict a
lifetime's supply of crack.
And, finally, the
two-dimensional Obama indignantly says NRLC was "lying" when we
asserted that he had voted against a state bill virtually
identical to the federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act,
intended to provide care and legal protection to infants who
survive abortions.
The three-dimensional
Obama, while an Illinois state Senator, not only led the
opposition to legislation to protect babies who are born alive
during abortions, but persisted in his opposition even after
Congress had enacted a virtually identical federal bill without
a single dissenting vote--and has completely distorted his
record every since!
My objective is not simply
for us to be able to say, "Hey, we told you so." That is
pointless. It is rather to equip you to gently but firmly speak
to your friends when they wake up from a dream they choose over
consciousness.
Much sooner than later,
tens of millions of people who should have known better will
sheepishly look you in the face and ruefully respond, "I guess I
should have known better."
Part One |