|
Minnesota’s
Attempt to Outlaw All Human Cloning
By Wesley J. Smith
Editor’s note.
This first appeared on Wesley’s great blog at
http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/secondhandsmoke/2011/03/15/minnesotas-attempt-to-outlaw-all-human-cloning
A bill is wending
its way through the Minnesota Legislature that would
make all human cloning, for example, through somatic
cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), in the state a felony. Not
just reproductive cloning–the kind of pseudo ban, but
actually, the prohibition of one use of a cloned embryo,
that the mainstream media and Big Biotech would support.
This would be a real ban on the creation of a human
embryo through asexual cloning methods. And, unlike
phony bans that actually seek to legalize human cloning
through the time-tested tactic of inaccurately defining
the term, the proposed ban gets the biology right. From
HF 998, the Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2011:
Subd. 2.
Definitions.
“Human cloning”
means human asexual reproduction accomplished by
introducing nuclear material from one or more human
somatic cells into a fertilized or unfertilized oocyte
whose nuclear material has been removed or inactivated
so as to produce a living organism at any stage of
development that is genetically virtually identical to
an existing or previously existing human organism.
None of the
nonsense about the act of cloning being the act of
implantation in a womb as in the phony bans.
Here’s the ban
part:
Subd. 3.
Prohibition on cloning. It is unlawful for any person or
entity, public or private, to knowingly:
1) perform or
attempt to perform human cloning;
(2) participate in an attempt to perform human cloning;
(3) ship or receive for any purpose an embryo produced
by human cloning or any product derived from such an
embryo; and
(4) ship or receive, in whole or in part, any oocyte,
embryo, fetus, or human somatic cell, for the purpose of
human cloning.
Expect “the
scientists” to insist this will thwart scientific
research in MN. But except for cloning research, that
would not be true:
Subd. 5.
Scientific research.
Nothing in this section shall
restrict areas of scientific research not specifically
prohibited by this section, including research in the
use of nuclear transfer of other cloning techniques to
produce molecules, DNA, cells other than human embryos,
tissues, organs, plants, or animals other than humans.
It is worth noting
that legislation does not outlaw embryonic stem cell
research, which is a different thing altogether than
human cloning–although promoters often try to conflate
the two to cause confusion and policy gridlock.
I think all human
cloning should be outlawed. So does the international
community, as expressed in an overwhelming vote in the
United Nations General Assembly several years ago. I
hope this bill passes. I’ll keep SHSers apprised of its
progress or lack of same.
The clip above is
from the CBC’s, Lines That Divide. Yes that old guy in
the gray beard is yours truly.
Part Three
Part One |