|
University of Mary
Washington students raise young voices for Life
By Olivia Gans, President
Virginia Society for Human Life
Last week, despite a major
day-long downpour of cold, Virginia rain, approximately 40 young
men and women braved the elements to attend an evening of
pro-life encouragement sponsored by the Campus Catholic Ministry
(CCM) at the University of Mary Washington.
The students were not all
members of the CCM but most knew each other. They had come out
to share a meal and hear my lecture entitled “Bringing Pro-life
Hope to a Hurting Society.”
From long experience I
know that understanding how being pro-life can make a powerful
difference in a culture that sees death (abortion/ euthanasia)
as the best “answer” we have to offer, is a message that
resonates with college students everywhere.
But, as I made clear, the
simple truth is that protecting life is hard work. It demands
commitment and creativity.
I reminded them that in
their college class work they are learning how to tap their own
creativity in order to make a mark in their chosen field. They
believe they have answers no one has yet thought of to
everything. That attitude can be an immense help to the pro-life
movement.
The audience was intense
and somber throughout most of the evening but broke in to joyful
laughter at regular intervals as we shared stories of success or
stumbles that each of us had encountered in trying to be
pro-life on a liberal, pro-abortion campus. One truth hit home
with many in the room: because they are true survivors of the
abortion generation; they were special and uniquely qualified to
speak and act on this issue.
Representatives of the
University of Mary Washington pro-life organization offered a
variety of options for their fellow students to participate in
over the rest of this year. Several of those activities involved
supporting the local Mother Helping Center. Other ideas revolved
around gently confronting their peers on campus in
thought-provoking ways.
I encouraged them to make
sure they were all registered to vote as there is no better way
to change the course of this debate than by electing strong
pro-life leaders at every level! As young adults they need to be
active in that vital part of our efforts. Even though they are
tucked away at school they can and must still play a role in the
process of how pro-life laws are made in America!
We discussed at length the
need to steadily and compassionately engage their peers. Since
theirs is the generation most effected by abortion, it is
critical that they initiate the discussion. The hard part is
that because of the damage done to this generation, it is also
true that many of their fellow students either have had an
abortion or know someone that has. That is the single most
powerful reason that walls rise up when the conversation begins.
The reality is that
talking about pro-life issues on any campus is challenging. Too
often, these students, like so many others I’ve met, say that
their own teachers are hostile to the facts of human life,
unwilling to honestly engage in a search for truth on the
pivotal question of our time. The eager young men and women at
UMW sometimes feel the pressure to be silent from all sides. Yet
was clear was that they are ready to meet that challenge.
After the lecture and a
Q&A, I stayed for an extra hour to chat with about 15 students.
We talked about making pro-life videos and letter-writing
projects to the schools paper that will help keep the issue on
the front burner on the campus. Becoming members of Virginia
Society for Human Life and NRLC and Young Pro-life Virginia (an
intercollegiate effort in Virginia) was also considered.
Working with others makes
a big difference.
The best part of my night
was at the very end when one young man, whom I’d noticed sitting
in the front, stepped up to speak to me.
He told me that he feared
that what he had to say might shut down our conversation then
and there. I paused and smiled at him and still shaking his hand
told him to hit me with his best shot!
He proceeded to tell me
that while he had been raised to be “pro-choice” and that he
thought he still was, he admitted that what I had shared that
evening about the effect of abortion on women’s lives and their
families as well as society had opened his eyes.
He was now to the point
where he agreed that abortion was probably not a healthy
response to a difficult situation. That perhaps we do need to
provide better answers that respect both mother and child more
effectively.
I thanked him for his
honesty and courage! I suggested that perhaps the best way for
him to get to know the Movement better was to look into the
end-of-life issues. We discussed the Robert Powell Center for
Medical Ethics, and I saw his face light up!
He acknowledged that he
was deeply concerned about those issues! We parted with
respect. I felt I just met a future pro-life leader!
I need your feedback on
both Today's News & Views and National Right to Life News Today.
Please send your comments to
daveandrusko@gmail.com.
If you like, join those who are following me on Twitter at
http://twitter.com/daveha
Part Five
Part Six
Part One
Part Two
Part Three |