Cynical, Even by
Pro-Abortion Standards
By Dave Andrusko
If you watch the way
pro-abortionists succeed at fending off even the most
commonsensical pro-life legislation, you quickly learn that they
have as many techniques as there are seconds in a day. But at
the top of their list of stratagems is to turn protective
measures into vile assaults on women. They are able to do this
because most people, including many pro-lifers, don’t know all
the facts.
Let me offer one of a
half-dozen different examples. I do so, not because it is
unusual, but because it is, even by pro-abortion less-than-lofty
standards, amazingly cynical.
There are various
legislative proposals to make sonograms available to women
contemplating abortions. For many, many years, abortionists were
able to keep it a secret that most/almost all of them already
used ultrasounds. For what purpose? To determine how old the
baby was and also to get a better “fix” on the victim whom they
were about to suction out or rip apart.
When that news finally
emerged, it was difficult to adhere to the old pro-abortion
party line: that pro-lifers were “demanding” something out of
the ordinary—even insisting on bad medicine—when they proposed
laws to make sonograms available to women about to abort. What
to do?
First, continue to act as
if abortion clinics don’t already use sonograms. But do that lie
one better [actually one worse]. Rage and fume that pro-lifers
are demanding an invasive, insulting, inhumane procedure: a
sonogram scan “in the woman’s uterus.”
But the truth is that
proposals to make sonograms available to abortion-vulnerable
women are ADDING nothing—as the Abortion Lobby knows perfectly
well—to what is already taking place.
Not only do abortionists
already routinely employ sonograms, the norm is to use what is
called a vaginal transducer (as opposed to an external
transducer). Common sense would tell you that an internal
reading would be more accurate than an external one. The result
is the abortionist gets a more accurate gauge of the baby’s age,
which allows him to know which abortion “procedure” to use.
Pro-abortionists know
this. Pro-abortionists know the general public doesn’t know
that. Pro-abortionist know that most legislators don’t know
this.
And they know they can
make it sound like 'rape by instrumentation' if they play their
cards right.
What a bunch!
I need your feedback on
both Today's News & Views and National Right to Life News Today.
Please send your comments to
daveandrusko@gmail.com.
If you like, join those who are following me on Twitter at
http://twitter.com/daveha.
Part One
Part Two
Part Three