Human Rights Groups Mark
International Women’s Day with Focus on Abuse of Women’s Rights
in China
Highest female suicide
rates, war on single moms, gender gap, forced sterilizations/
abortions are legacy of ‘One-Child’ Policy; UN should stop
supporting ‘One-Child Policy’
Editor’s note. My apologies for not getting this out
yesterday. The following is the statement of Congressman Chris
Smith (R-NJ) at a press conference Monday marking the 100th
Anniversary of International Women’s Day. Cong. Smith is
Chairman of the Africa, Global Health and Human Rights
Subcommittee.
 |
|
Congressman Chris
Smith |
As we mark the 100th
International Women’s Day tomorrow, we appeal to the United
Nations to end its complicity in coercive population control and
defend women and children from forced abortion and forced
sterilization in China – the worst gender crime in the world
today, and, in scale, certainly the most massive. We direct our
appeal to the United Nations itself, to Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon,
to all UN agencies – especially the UNFPA: pay attention to the
UN treaty bodies, which have recognized the Chinese government’s
barbaric violence and coercion against women – and stop
supporting, or protecting by your silence, or passing over
lightly, these terrible crimes.
As the world celebrates International Women’s Day, too few
people outside China understand the massive and cruel repression
and violence perpetrated, intentionally and systematically, on
hundreds of millions of women by the Chinese government, with
the complicity and, at certain levels, the cooperation of the
United Nations. As the U.S. China Commission summarized, the
one-child policy is “marked by pervasive propaganda, mandatory
monitoring of women's reproductive cycles, mandatory
contraception, mandatory birth permits, coercive fines for
failure to comply, and… forced sterilization and abortion.”
Today is the day to remember the staggering price Chinese women
pay when they fail to conform to this policy. A Chinese woman
who becomes pregnant without a permit will be put under
mind-bending pressure to abort. She knows that “out-of-plan”
illegal children are denied education, health-care, and
marriage, and that fines for bearing a child without a birth
permit can be 10 times the average annual income of two parents,
and those families that can’t or won’t pay are jailed, or their
homes smashed in, or their young child is killed. If the brave
woman still refuses to submit, she may be held in a punishment
cell, or, if she flees, her relatives may be held and, very
often, beaten. Group punishments will be used to socially
ostracize her--her colleagues and neighbors will be denied birth
permits. If the woman is by some miracle still able to resist
this pressure, she will be physically dragged to the operating
table and forced to undergo an abortion.
Her trauma is incomprehensible. It is a trauma she shares, in
some degree, with every woman in China, hundreds of millions of
women, whose experience of intimacy and motherhood is colored by
the atmosphere of fear created by the government, by government
threats and determination to intrude itself, in deadly fashion,
into the most personal aspects of her life, as a woman, a
mother, a wife.
What has the UN, which boasts of so many programs to promote and
protect women, done to defend women from all this? Very little –
and, sadly, for thirty years one of its agencies, the United
Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), has vigorously supported,
funded, defended, promoted, even celebrated these massive crimes
against women.
The UNFPA not only plays an essential role in training the
Chinese cadres who run this anti-woman program, but the UNFPA
assists in the implementation of the one-child policy in several
Chinese counties – where the implementation is no less harsh
than elsewhere in China.
The UNFPA has done all this quite openly and unashamedly. UNFPA
representative Sven Burmester said in 1999: “China has had the
most successful family planning policy in the history of
mankind... .” The UNFPA has stood not with oppressed women but
with the oppressors of women – it is a UN body that has made the
Chinese government’s killing machine more efficacious and
lethal, a UN body that has systematically whitewashed and
defended its crimes against humanity.
In denying U.S. funds to the UNFPA in 2008, Deputy Secretary of
State John Negroponte wrote: “China’s birth limitation program
retains harshly coercive elements in law and practice, including
coercive abortion and involuntary sterilization… it is illegal
in almost all provinces for a single woman to bear a child…” The
State Department noted that Chinese law is “the foundation of
its coercive policies and practices” and that the UNFPA comports
with and adheres to “Chinese law.” To date, President Obama has
provided over $100 million to the UNFPA.
The societal implications of the UN-supported one-child policy
are staggering. According to the WHO, about 500 Chinese women
commit suicide every day – China is the only country in the
world where the female suicide rate is higher than the male. The
policy has led to the worst gender disparity in any country in
history. Today, there are tens of millions of missing girls and
women in China – gendercide, the evil twin of genocide – and
tens of millions of men can’t find wives – because for 30 years
and counting, the restriction to one child has led to the
targeting of girls in sex-selective abortion, the ultimate
gender discrimination. China has become a magnet for sex
trafficking in large measure due to the ‘missing girls.’
What about the other UN agencies and human rights treaty bodies?
The treaty bodies have shown that they know about the gross
human rights violations perpetrated against women and girls by
Chinese officials. And yet the UN handles China with kid gloves,
and whispers when it should be crying out much more loudly.
Sadly, in the Universal Periodic Review, in 2009, the Chinese
government was given a complete pass on the one-child policy and
forced abortion.
At this point, I’d like to call on:
-
UN Secretary-General Ban
Ki-moon to speak out against the Chinese government’s
systematic violation of hundreds of millions of Chinese
women – to fail to speak out against what is by far the
worst gender-based violence in history would make a mockery
of the UN’s claim to promote women;
-
the Obama Administration
and other members of the UN Human Rights Council to call a
Special Session in the Human Rights Council and to address
the ongoing crisis of gendercide in China and China’s
missing girls;
-
Michelle Bachelet, the
Executive Director and Under-Secretary General for UN Women,
to make the crimes against women in China a top priority for
UN Women to assist China in addressing population challenges
in ways that respect the rights of women and girls and do
not result in a massive and gross violation of women’s human
rights;
-
the Committee overseeing
the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability to
raise with China the practice of eugenic forced abortion and
eugenic infanticide when China is review by the Committee
later this year;
-
the UN’s Special
Rapporteur on Violence against women, Its Causes and
consequences, Rashida Manjoo, to make a fact-finding visit
to China regarding violence and abuses connected to the
enforcement of the one-child policy and to issue a full
report;
-
the UN’s Special
Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially in women
and children (Ms. Joy Ngozi Ezeilo and the Special
Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment (Mr. Juan Méndez) to also make
fact-finding trips to China in order to fully document the
effects of China’s one child policy and forced abortions
which have created a gross gender imbalance in the region;
-
the UNFPA to cease and
desist from all collaboration or support for China’s
population control policy – the most massive human rights
violation in the world today.
I and other members of
Congress will be sending these officials letters formally
requesting them to undertake these actions – all of which are
simply duties of their offices – in defense of Chinese women
brutalized by the one-child policy.
Part One
Part Two
Part Three |