Action Alert,
PPFA, NAF, and Abortionist Kermit Gosnell
By Dave Andrusko
I would like to use this space to discuss several items.
First,
please be sure to respond to Part One—the NRLC Action
Alert—and pass the alert along to your friends. The most
important two sentences: “Please call, today, the
offices of your two U.S. senators, and your
representative in the House of Representatives. Urge
them to insist that the Pence Amendment, removing all
federal funds from Planned Parenthood, must remain part
of the final appropriations bill.”
Second, carefully read today’s excerpts from the grand
jury investigation into abortionist and accused murderer
Kermit Gosnell (“Enabling Gosnell to operate in the
manner that killed Ms. Shaw, Mrs. Mongar, and untold
numbers of babies”). See how absolutely determined were
the people responsible for overseeing abortion clinics
to do nothing of the sort.
Even the death of a second woman at Gosnell’s abortion
clinic did not trigger an inspection or investigation.
Instead the relevant authorities fixated on a
meaningless on-line report , the idea being then to
“charge Gosnell with failing to file the report in a
timely and proper manner,” according to the Grand Jury
report.
After law enforcement raided the clinic (looking for
evidence of illegal drug prescriptions), they urged the
Department of Health (DOH) to look at Gosnell’s clinic.
When they finally did, one woman “complained [to a
member of legal counsel] that a representative of the
District Attorney’s Office was ‘badgering’ DOH staff to
shut down the facility immediately,” according to the
grand jury report.
The response? “I’d say we were used,” which solicited a
“Bingo.”
The grand jury indignantly observes that “the woman most
directly responsible for the department’s oversight of
abortion facilities, told the Grand Jury: ‘I haven’t
been in any facilities in probably – in an abortion
facility in many, many years.’ The citizens of
Pennsylvania deserve far better from those charged with
protecting public health and safety.”
Third, I re-read a piece that Vicki Saporta, president
of the National Abortion Federation (NAF), wrote last
September on a pro-abortion site: “Don't Judge All
Abortion Providers Based on the Case of Steven Brigham.”
(Brigham is a notorious abortionist who, as Saporta
concedes, “has had his medical license temporarily
suspended, relinquished, or revoked in five states.”)
This, of course, before the Gosnell debacle became
public.
Saporta parroted the party line that “abortion opponents
…are using this opportunity to call for more regulations
on all providers in an attempt to further their goal of
limiting women’s access to abortion care.” You’re darn
tootin'. Abortion clinics are not sanctuaries—or at
least they ought not to be—free to do whatever they
choose. That is why abortion clinic regulation
legislation is working its way through various state
legislatures.
And there is an intersection between NAF and Gosnell, as
the Grand Jury report detailed. "Gosnell, bizarrely,
applied for admission [to NAF] shortly after Karnamaya
Mongar's death."
An evaluator from NAF saw problems at his clinic. "It
was the worst abortion clinic she had ever inspected,”
the Grand Jury report explained. “Of course, she
rejected Gosnell's application. She just never told
anyone in authority about all the horrible, dangerous
things she had seen.”
“Bureaucratic inertia is not exactly news. We understand
that. But we think this was something more.” What?
“ We think the reason no one acted is because the women
in question were poor and of color, because the victims
were infants without identities, and because the subject
was the political football of abortion."
I need your feedback on both Today's News & Views and
National Right to Life News Today. Please send your
comments to
daveandrusko@gmail.com. If you like, join
those who are following me on Twitter at
http://twitter.com/daveha.
Part Three
Part Four
Part One |