|
Baby Elizabeth and the
Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act
By Dave Andrusko
There are no villains in
this story, outside of an abortion chain which is dropping broad
hints it might be eager to exploit a tragedy for its own
purposes. I am referring to Danielle and Robb Deaver, a Nebraska
couple, whose story first broke over the weekend in the Des
Moines Register, Iowa’s largest and most influential newspaper.
Iowa is one of several
states promoting legislation that is essentially identical to
Nebraska’s historic Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.
That first-of-its-kind measure, which passed by huge margins and
which the usual pro-abortion suspects have yet to challenge,
prevents abortions after 20 weeks, the point at which when
substantial medical evidence clearly indicates unborn children
feel pain.
Mrs. Deaver told the
Register’s Jason Claymore that she was eagerly anticipating the
birth of her second child last November (she’d suffered three
miscarriages) when her water broke. At the time she was 22-weeks
pregnant. The next day an ultrasound showed there was barely any
amniotic fluid surrounding their baby girl.
According to the Register,
Danielle was told she had suffered anhydramnios, a premature
rupture of the membranes. Without amniotic fluid, the couple was
told the infant would be born with facial and skull deformities
(because the baby’s skull was still soft), a shortening of
muscle tissue that causes an inability to move limbs, and the
likelihood the baby’s lungs would not develop further.
The couple said the first
they learned of Nebraska’s law was when they told the
perinatologist they want to “put an end to this
nightmare”—induce a delivery.
The perinatologist
explained Nebraska’s law to them.
Danielle went into
contractions eight days later. Elizabeth, whom she described as
“perfect,” lived for 15 minutes.
That appears to be the
medical basics of this very, very sad situation. It gets more
complicated from there.
“The Deavers have
contacted Planned Parenthood of the Heartland but have not
determined whether they will pursue a case to challenge the
constitutionality of the Nebraska law,” according to the
Register’s Claymore. Planned Parenthood of the Heartland (PPH)
is a major force in the Midwest.
PPH is one of Planned
Parenthood's premier affiliates, with 23 clinics and three
"education and resources centers" in Iowa, and Nebraska. Sixteen
of its 19 clinics in Iowa offer abortion, and two of the three
which do not are in Des Moines, where PPH already has two
abortion performing centers.
One of the group's four
clinics in Nebraska, the one in Lincoln, currently performs
abortions, but these are a relatively new acquisitions for PPH.
PPH has already announced plans for a new large facility in
Omaha which will be offering abortions. These days, Planned
Parenthood of the Heartland is known for its "innovation" of the
web-cam abortion, which is has put in place at many of its
smaller clinics.
It’s not being overly
cynical, I think, to wonder whether PP of the Heartland is
contemplating using the Deavers as a test case
Abortion techniques
typically used in the second trimester are exceedingly gruesome,
ranging from dismemberment to injecting poison into the baby’s
heart.
To be clear there is
nothing in the story that suggests that the Deavers would have
used either of these abortion techniques. But had the baby’s
delivery been induced, Elizabeth still would have gone through
the same struggle to breathe that she did when she was born
spontaneously eight days later.
Elizabeth was born at 3:00
p.m. December 8, weighing 1-pound, 10-ounce . She was 23 weeks,
five days. “What [Mrs.] Deaver saw was perfection: A tiny but
beautiful child. Ten toes. Ten fingers. Long eyelashes,”
Claymore wrote. Granted, I am a pro-lifer. But I honestly think
that even if you weren’t, were you to watch the video you might
come to the same conclusion that I did.
And that is while the
Deavers are both sad and angry now, in years to come they will
come to believe that having the chance to hold their baby even
for those few minutes was the right thing to do.
“For now, the Devers say
speaking out is a form of therapy,” Claymore wrote.
Julie Schmit-Albin is
Nebraska Right to Life’s executive director and a major force
behind the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Action. “What a
tragedy it is when there is a poor prenatal diagnosis for the
baby,” she said. “But isn't it more humane for that same baby to
die in a loving manner with comfort care and in the arms of her
parents than by the intentional painful death through abortion?”
“It is a sad reality that
some unborn babies are so injured that they do not survive,”
said Mary Spaulding Balch, NRLC Director of State Legislation,
who worked closely with Schmit-Albin. “Abortion falsely promises
to give us ‘control ,’ but abortion would not have changed the
outcome for baby Elizabeth.”
Balch ended by observing
that it is the very same Nebraska law that the Deavers are so
passionately criticizing “ensured that Danielle Deaver would be
able to hold her precious Elizabeth in her arms.”
Please send your
comments to
daveandrusko@gmail.com. If you like, join those who are
following me on Twitter at
http://twitter.com/daveha.
Part Two
Part Three |