Bookmark and Share  
 
Today's News & Views
March 25, 2010
 

An Unpopular Bill That Will Not Stand
Part Three of Three

By Dave Andrusko

We've written about ObamaCare (aka health care "reform") virtually every day for weeks. We will continue to update you on the fallout from Sunday's vote, fallout that is JUST beginning.

(Before I get started, be sure to read Parts One and Two and go to www.nationalrighttolifenews.org.)

Pro-abortion President Barack Obama signs meaningless executive order.

The oldest ploy known to man is to argue that since "both sides" are unhappy with [whatever it is], then whatever "it" is, is probably pretty good policy. (Reporters habitually trot that canard out. But if "both sides" are mad at your story, perhaps you just did a crummy job. But I digress.)

Pro-abortionists are said to be unhappy with the abortion components of the Senate bill which became law Tuesday after the House voted in favor of it on Sunday and President Obama signed the measure into law Tuesday. So, too, are pro-lifers--adamantly so.

The abortion side is unhappy because they did not win everything they had in their bottomless agenda. And the importance of that limitation is not to be belittled. Had it not been for the hard work of countless pro-lifers, the pro-abortion side would have won everything that mattered to them except the inclusion of a tunnel that runs directly from the U.S. Treasury to every Planned Parenthood clinic in America.

But pro-abortionists would have you believe they won essentially nothing--even went backwards--because of some bookkeeping requirements in the bill and a toothless executive order signed by pro-abortion President Barack Obama. But not only is the language of the order useless, it "doesn't mean a doggone thing," according to Sen. Orrin Hatch, because the Obama administration "can change it any time."

A number of erstwhile pro-life Democrats "rewarded" pro-lifers by using the executive order as an excuse to cast a vote for the biggest Congressional expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade. House Minority Leader John Boehner quite correctly said the executive order is a "transparent attempt to provide political cover to Washington Democrats who betrayed their constituents" by voting for the law.

The truth, ironically, was contained in a story in today's USA Today by Mini Hall, headlined, "Both Sides of Abortion Issue Quick to Dismiss Order." NRLC's Douglas Johnson called the Obama Executive Order "A transparent political fig leaf. " But PPFA President Cecile Richard obviously forgot to read the pro-abortion talking points. She characterized the order as "A symbolic gesture"!

Let me close with this from Rasmussen Reports. It is very much worth remembering at this time in our struggle.

"Just before the House of Representatives passed sweeping health care legislation last Sunday, 41% of voters nationwide favored the legislation while 54% were opposed. Now that President Obama has signed the legislation into law, most voters want to see it repealed. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey, conducted on the first two nights after the president signed the bill, shows that 55% favor repealing the legislation. Forty-two percent (42%) oppose repeal. Those figures include 46% who Strongly Favor repeal and 35% who Strongly Oppose it.

"In terms of Election 2010, 52% say they'd vote for a candidate who favors repeal over one who does not. Forty-one percent (41%) would cast their vote for someone who opposes repeal."

This bill is not popular, not at all. It will not stand.

Please send your comments to daveandrusko@gmail.com.  And don't forget to visit www.nationalrighttolifenews.org.

Part One
Part Two