Stem-Cell Health Care Must Put the Patients
First
Part Two of Three
By Rep.
Randy Forbes and David Prentice
This first appeared in Roll Call, March
22, 2010.
As spiraling health care costs increase and
public debate over health care collide in
the headlines, it's time to question the
value that Americans have received for their
tax dollar investment in some medical
research.
Specifically, how are health dollars being
allocated regarding actual promising
treatments for patients versus speculative,
controversial research?
Last
March, President Barack Obama opened more
taxpayer funding for stem-cell research and
authorized use of virtually any embryonic
stem cells for research. As a result, the
National Institutes of Health has approved
43 new embryonic stem-cell lines for
taxpayer-funded experiments, but that is not
necessarily good news for sick people.
The only approved experiment for embryonic
stem-cell injections into humans, for newly
injured spinal cord patients, is on hold by
the Food and Drug Administration because of
safety concerns. Those concerns include the
fact that in animal experiments, embryonic
stem cells can lead to cancer or misplaced
tissue formation. These are not minor side
effects, but potentially fatal in their own
right.
In the
meantime, noncontroversial adult stem cells
from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood and
other tissues are treating thousands of
patients around the globe right now. It's
estimated that more than 50,000 adult
stem-cell transplants occur annually
worldwide.
Virginia has seen more than 2,500 patients
treated with adult stem cells, while
Illinois records show more than 10,000
patients treated.
The
majority of current stem-cell transplants
treat anemias, leukemias and other cancers
and solid tumors in adults and children. For
some diseases, adult stem-cell transplants
have become the "standard of care," meaning
the treatments are so effective that they
are a doctor's best choice for sick
patients.
But
the realization is growing that adult stem
cells can treat much more than blood
diseases and cancer. Published science now
shows evidence for a wide range of
applications, with examples of success at
improving the health of patients with more
than 70 different diseases and injuries.
Adult stem cells are already helping many
people.
People like Laura Dominguez. Quadriplegic
after a car accident, Laura was treated for
spinal cord injury with her own nasal adult
stem cells, and she has regained movement
and sensation in her lower body. Laura
continues to work hard at her physical
therapy, bluntly stating, "I'm going to walk
again." You can see Laura's story and others
at
www.stemcellresearchfacts.org.
People like Amy Daniels. A young mother of
two, Amy was told she had a fatal condition
called scleroderma, an autoimmune disease
that turns organs and tissues to stone. She
wrote a letter to her husband telling him it
was OK to move on after she died. But Amy
has thrown away that letter, because after
treatment with her own bone marrow adult
stem cells, she lives a normal life.
People
like Barry Goudy. With his multiple
sclerosis worsening, Barry faced life in a
wheelchair. Yet six and a half years after
his adult stem-cell transplant, Barry is
fully active and coaches a hockey team.
People
like Jaider Abbud. Newly diagnosed with Type
I diabetes, Jaider was facing a lifetime of
blood glucose checks and insulin shots.
Using his own bone marrow adult stem cells
to "reboot" his immune system means Jaider
takes no medications whatsoever now.
People
like Doug Rice. After his doctor told him
his heart attacks had damaged his heart so
badly that he only had a short time to live,
Doug sought out a therapy that injected his
own adult stem cells into his heart, helping
it rebuild damaged muscle. The ex-Marine now
can't stop telling others how his life was
saved.
These
are just a few of the thousands who have
already been helped by adult stem cells.
Clinical trials are ongoing to improve
current adult stem-cell treatments and
develop others. In Virginia, more than 70
adult stem- cell-related FDA-approved
clinical trials are taking place now or
already completed. In Illinois, the number
of such trials is above 200,with nearly
2,000 adult stem-cell trials worldwide.
But
much more needs to be done, and many more
resources need to be focused on patients
using these life-saving possibilities. The
federal government has spent more than half
a billion dollars on human embryonic
stem-cell research since 2002, and funding
for this controversial research has
increased more than 40 percent since 2008.
Meanwhile, funding for human adult stem-cell
research, much of which is invested in the
clinical trials for patients that we
mentioned, increased only 20 percent during
that same time period.
We
propose a focus on those who need these
treatments and that funding. The
Forbes-Lipinski bill, the Patients First Act
(H.R. 877), would prioritize stem-cell
funding for projects that have the greatest
chance for near-term benefit for patients,
based on the scientific evidence.
There's no controversy in treatments that
work and help people now. It's time to set
aside debate and controversy and come
together to concentrate on real health care
that puts the patients first. It's not just
tax dollars that are wasted on poor science;
real lives are being lost.
Rep.
Randy Forbes (R) is in his fifth term
representing the 4th district of Virginia.
Dr. David Prentice, Ph.D., who spent 20
years as a university researcher and
professor, is senior fellow for life
sciences at the Family Research Council.
Part Three
Part One |