Chief Justice Roberts Gently
Responds to President Obama's
Attack
Part Three of Three
By Dave Andrusko
I suppose it was only a matter
of time and opportunity before
Chief Justice John Roberts would
respond to President Obama's
State of the Union assault on a
campaign-finance decision the
Court had just rendered. As you
may remember, Democrats rose to
their feet, hooting and
hollering, as the President
denounced the Court's 5-4
decision in Citizens United v.
Federal Elections Commission.
Protocol requires that the
Justices, six of whom were in
attendance, do not respond to
anything, including being
enveloped in a sea of hostile
politicians.
 |
Supreme Court
Chief Justice John
Roberts address
students at the
University of
Alabama Law School.
|
Chief Justice Roberts' response
came in a Q&A after delivering a
speech yesterday to law students
at the University of Alabama.
After choosing not to answer
criticism of the decision
itself, Roberts did respond to
the question "whether it was
proper to use the State of the
Union address to 'chide' the
court for its decision,"
according to the Washington
Post.
"First of all, anybody can
criticize the Supreme Court
without any qualm," he said,
adding that "some people, I
think, have an obligation to
criticize what we do, given
their office, if they think
we've done something wrong. …So
I have no problems with that."
At that point the tone of his
voice changed:
"On the other hand, there is the
issue of the setting, the
circumstances and the decorum,"
he told the students. "The image
of having the members of one
branch of government standing
up, literally surrounding the
Supreme Court, cheering and
hollering while the court --
according the requirements of
protocol -- has to sit there
expressionless, I think is very
troubling."
You may remember that when Obama
lectured the Court, Associate
Justice Samuel Alito shook his
head and appeared to say, "Not
true." Ironically, Alito took
most of the heat for privately
mouthing two words while Obama
got off scotch-free even though
"for the first time in modern
history," wrote Chief Legal
Correspondent Jan Crawford on
her CBS News blog, a President
"took a direct shot at the
Supreme Court."
Needless to add White House
Press Secretary Robert Gibbs
took another shot at the
decision this morning as did
Senate Judiciary Committee
Chairman Patrick Leahy. However
Roberts may have had the final
word yesterday.
"To the extent the State of the
Union has degenerated into a
political pep rally, I'm not
sure why we're there," Roberts
said.
Please send your comments to
daveandrusko@gmail.com.
Part
One
Part Two |