|
Vermont
House of Representatives Defeats Assisted Suicide Bill
Part One of Two
Editor's note.
I would love to hear your opinion on this great victory. Please write to
daveandrusko@hotmail.com.
In what can only
be described as one of the most stunning turnarounds in memory, Vermont's
House of Representatives yesterday defeated an assisted suicide bill,
patterned after Oregon's "Death With Dignity" Act, on a vote of 82 against
to only 63 in support. As recently as a couple of weeks ago, it appeared
that only a miracle could defeat H44.
That "miracle"
came about and was comprised largely of enormously effective grassroots
efforts, led by Vermont Right to Life and the Catholic Church, and the
transforming power of real debate about a bill that would (in the worlds of
Rep. Peg Flory) "tell our old citizens, our dying citizens, that we regard
them as a burden." Rep. Flory spoke eloquently of caring for her father as
he was dying of cancer.
According to
Vermont Right to Life Executive Director Mary Hahn Beerworth, "the State
House handled a record number of phone calls in the weeks leading up to the
debate on the House floor--and it has been widely reported that the calls
ran 10 to 1 against passage of H44."
Beerworth said
proponents of H44 "had everything money can buy--eight of the top lobbyists
in the state, television commercials featuring three former Governors
running ad nauseam, and a House made up of liberal Democrats." She described
the vote as "truly an historic moment."
"If legislation to
legalize assisted suicide can be beaten in Vermont," she added, "it can be
beaten anywhere!"
The results were
surprising, not only because H44 was defeated, but also because of the size
of the margin. Proponents, who were confident going in, took the public
posture that the vote would be close.
The example of
Rep. Patricia O'Donnell may illustrate the dynamics at play. O'Donnell had
also watched her father die of cancer, according to the Burlington Free
Press, and fully expected to vote in favor of the law.
"She changed her
mind Wednesday afternoon, she said, as she listened to the debate and
worried whether there were enough safeguards to prevent abuse of the law,"
the Free Press reported. "O'Donnell said afterward that it was the
first time she's ever changed her mind about a bill while it was on the
floor.
"'I think a lot of
people changed their minds during the debate,' O'Donnell said."
The debate
illustrated yet again that once discussion gets beyond the assurances of
proponents of assisted suicide--to how such a measure would work in practice
and what values would be lost--people have second thoughts.
Rep. Virginia
Milkey, for instance, questioned whether the legislature ought to be in the
business of changing the historic role of physicians. "Why not look at other
ways we can relieve suffering?" she asked, according to the Free Press.
Rep. Kathy Lavoie
insisted that legislators call a spade a spade, asking why, under the
proposed law, the death certificate would list the patient's underlying
illness rather than suicide as the cause of death. "Let's call this action
what it is," she said.
In the March issue
of NRL News, Beerworth wrote prophetically of the situation.
"Is passage
inevitable? The simple answer is no, because defeat is unthinkable. With
dedicated volunteers, prayers, and a coalition of Vermonters who are
speaking out against assisted suicide, we are giving this fight everything
we've got."
If you have any
comments or questions, please write Dave Andrusko at
daveandrusko@hotmail.com.
Part Two |