|
Looking Ahead to NRL '2008
-- Part One of Two Let me
begin our Friday smorgasbord with the most important item. By clicking on
http://nrlcconvention.blogspot.com, you've be quickly updated on the
latest news regarding the pro-life educational event of the year which is
just around the corner. It's just around the corner, come to think of it, in
two ways.
Chronologically, NRL '2008 is less
than three weeks away. July 3 is the opening of this three-day educational
bonanza.
Geographically, the convention takes
place in Crystal City, Virginia. The hotel is only a few Metro stops from
our nation's Capital. And on the 4th of July, you can join a half-million of
your fellow Americans on the National Mall to celebrate our nation's
birthday.
*The Pew Forum on Religion & Public
Life is very influential. Its work is given a lot of publicity and (perhaps)
more credence than it deserves.
On its web page, it's announcing that
on Monday it will release "Part II of the Pew Forum's Religious Landscape
Survey includes a wealth of information on the religious beliefs and
practices of the American public, including the importance of religion in
people's lives, belief in God, frequency of prayer and frequency of
attendance at worship services. " Specific to our concern, "It also explores
the social and political attitudes of religious groups, such as attitudes on
abortion…"
I'll fill you in on what it says…and
doesn't say…and says wrong on Monday or Tuesday.
*We have been covering the case of
84-year-old Samuel Golubchuk from whom doctors at Grace Hospital in
Winnipeg, Manitoba want to remove his ventilator and feeding tube. (See Part
Two.) A Canadian judge has blocked, for now, the hospital's efforts,
responding to the aggressive objections of Golubchuk's family. Nonetheless
Hospital officials continue to maintain that Golubchuk's care is "futile"
and told the court he is "barely above a vegetative state," the Free Press
reported.
A couple of days ago the Winnipeg Free
Press ran a fascinating piece about Lori Ross "who was declared brain-dead
10 years ago" and "is speaking out against how she thinks doctors
underestimate the quality of life of people with disabilities." She really
knows of what she speaks.
Ross, who had polio, was rushed to the
hospital after she stopped breathing. Incredibly, after only four hours, her
parents were told Lori was "brain dead." Fortunately, her parents found a
lawyer from the Independent Living Resource Centre (where Lori now works).
The hospital kept Ross on life support
and, lo and behold, "she soon became conscious and slowly began to recover,"
the Free Press reported. "Ross decided to speak out about her experience in
light of the Samuel Golubchuk case currently before the courts. Golubchuk
suffered a brain injury in a 2003 fall and was placed on life-support on
Nov. 3."
Referring to the attitude of many
doctors towards people with disabilities, Ross said, ""They think they've
already suffered so much but if they do not know the person, what we've gone
through, they have no way of judging it based on their book learning."
The best the medical establishment (in
the form of Dr. Jeff Blackmer, Canadian Medical Association office of ethics
executive director) could say was, "Today, you would look at that and say
that wasn't enough time." So how long is long enough? Blackmer told the Free
Press. "It usually takes a day or two to get proper expert opinions and in
an urgent situation it could be quicker." (Emphasis added.)
Blackmer added both that the two cases
are different and that in the past ten years the criteria for determining
that a patient is brain dead "have changed drastically."
"What the Canadian public needs to
understand is that cases of clinical mistakes are very, very rare and when
it does happen it gets a lot of attention," Blackmer said. "The key message
is there is no risk that people will have their ventilator, for example,
shut off prematurely."
Tell that to the Golubchuk family.
On their web page [www.samuelgolubchuk.com],
a daughter put her dad's plight into context.
"This is not just about Sam's life.
We're also fighting for ourselves, our children and everyone we care about.
We're fighting for the kind of society we want to live in and leave to
future generations. If bureaucrats can refuse to care for our father because
he's too old and disabled, then they can refuse to care for anyone they deem
unworthy."
Please send your comments to
daveandrusko@hotmail.com
Part
Two |