The Pain of the Unborn and
"The Cultural and Family Experience of Post-abortion Syndrome"
Part One of Three
By Dave Andrusko
Good evening.
Part Two examines the Obama
Administration's determination to shape the face of American
medicine in a way that guarantees rationing.
Part Three talks
about the exciting victories in the state legislatures. In
National Right to Life News Today (www.nationalrighttolifenews.org),
we talk about "The New Abortion Providers" and remind you of the
opportunity to buy CDs from NRLC 2010. Please send all of your
comments to
daveandrusko@gmail.com. If you like, join those who are now
following me on Twitter at
http://twitter.com/daveha.
Friday's editions of
"Today's News & Views" and "National Right to Life News Today"
are the last before my family goes on vacation. Today will be
chock-full of items, and over the next week or two I'll run new
stories/columns and a selection of some of the pieces you liked
best (based on the email).
 |
Bill and Rachel
Benda, Greg Hasek, Karen
Cross, Betty Fralich,
and Olivia Gans
addressing the 2010 NRLC Convention about the Effect
of Abortion on the Family.
|
Part One today begins as a
follow-up to two of yesterday's articles. Olivia Gans' account
of a deeply moving workshop at NRLC 2010 deserves widespread
distribution. If you missed "AVA Examines Generations Lost at
NRLC 2010!" you can read it at
www.nrlc.org/News_and_Views/July10/nv071510part2.html and
then distribute it through your social networks.
I've now attended 30 (yes,
thirty) NRLC conventions, beginning in Omaha, Nebraska in 1981.
But the workshop titled, "What has Abortion Done to Us? The
Cultural and Family Experience of Post-abortion Syndrome" was
the first time I'd ever heard a parent talk about his (or, this
case, her) role in the death of their grandchild.
Making an already powerful
setting even more memorable was that her daughter was also part
of the panel. Abortion--"a decision between a woman and her
doctor"? This mindless drivel would be almost laughable if the
stakes weren't so enormously high. Be sure to order a copy of
the CD at
http://www.nrlc.org/convention/NRLC2010CDOrderForm.pdf.
Equally important to
distribute far and wide is Dr. Paul Ranalli's immensely detailed
but equally readable rebuttal of the Royal College of
Obstetricians Gynecologists' contention that the unborn cannot
feel pain until at least the 24th week. (See http://www.nrlc.org/News_and_Views/July10/nv071510.html.)
We can never hope to match the gazillions of dollars of free
publicity the report garnered from the "mainstream" press, but
we can--and must--spread the truth through our own channels.
 |
|
Paul Ranalli |
No one, to the best of my
knowledge, except Dr. Ranalli has acknowledged that for all its
inadequacies, RCOG's report obliterates the conclusion of a 2005
pro-abortion "study" in the Journal of the American Medical
Association (JAMA) which purported to show that the unborn could
not feel pain until the 29th week. Truth be told there is an
overwhelming amount of research that everything is in place for
the unborn child to experience pain not at 29 weeks or 24 weeks
but at 20 weeks.
I've read dozens and
dozens of stories and opinion pieces about RCOG's report. With
virtually no exceptions, they uncritically take on faith
everything RCOG says, even such absurdities as the notion (draw
from bogus analogies with fetal lambs) that the unborn is asleep
("the fetus never enters a state of wakefulness in utero").
Best of all, Dr. Ranalli
offers highlights of the weaknesses of RCOG's report. The CD can
be ordered at
http://www.nrlc.org/convention/NRLC2010CDOrderForm.pdf.
Please be sure to read
Parts Two and
Three of TN&V and
National Right to Life News Today. |