Douglas Johnson of NRLC
Responds on a Few Points
Part Two of Two
Editor's note. This is NRLC Federal Legislative
Director Douglas Johnson's rebuttal to a column
written by Slate's Will Saletan.
I believe that Mr. Saletan's
analysis reflects either a greatly distorted
perception or a highly tendentious presentation
of what is really going on, but for the moment I
will confine myself to a few points of
clarification and elaboration.
I referred to the capable
Rachel Laser of Third Way as a career
pro-abortion activist because that is what she
is. Before joining Third Way, she was an
attorney with the reproductive rights project at
the National Women's Law Center. Before that she
was general counsel to Planned Parenthood of
Metropolitan Washington, a major abortion
provider. In my opinion, nowadays she continues
to pursue the same policy goals by other means,
utilizing what in military terminology are
termed false flag operations. By this I mean
that Third Way is devoted to advancing and
consolidating the public policy goals of the
pro-abortion lobby, with a methodology that
employs misleading rhetoric, labels, and props
intended to disguise the substance of that
agenda, and to provide political camouflage for
the pro-abortion politicians who adopt their
approach.
As one example, we see a
politician (Barack Obama) who has never
supported the slightest limitation on abortion,
and who is pushing hard for health care
legislation that would result in the greatest
expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade,
proceeding behind cover of a Third-Way-style
smokescreen that is purely rhetorical (seeking
abortion reduction, common ground, etc.).
Mr. Saletan fails to
appreciate that the Ryan-DeLauro bill is little
more than a prop in this political charade. Mr.
Saletan is looking square at a Potemkin village,
and he is most interested in discussing the
details of the plumbing. Why did Third Way
sponsor a common ground press conference on
Capitol Hill on July 23? Ostensibly to promote
the Ryan-DeLauro abortion reduction bill, but
really, for the primary purpose of furthering
the abortion lobby's attempts to undercut
efforts by bona fide pro-life members of the
House of Representatives [led by Chris Smith,
Republican of New Jersey; Bart Stupak, Democrat
of Michigan; and Joe Pitts, Republican of
Pennsylvania] to amend the Obama-backed health
care legislation to prevent subsidies and
mandates for abortion. (Here again, Ryan is just
the front man -- the power brokers are Speaker
Pelosi, Congressman Henry Waxman, and the White
House.) On July 21, two days before the Third
Way common ground press conference, Ryan sent a
public letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
proposing a common ground compromise on abortion
in the health care legislation. I'll spare you
the details of the subtext here: the bottom line
is, under the Ryan-Pelosi-Waxman scheme, the
huge new federal subsidies would flow to health
plans that fund elective abortions. That would
be a big victory for the pro-abortion side,
because currently, nobody has federally
subsidized abortion coverage -- not in Medicaid,
not the military, not federal employees.
Under the Obama-backed
legislation, with or without the phony Ryan
language, we could see 70 million or more
Americans with federally subsidized coverage of
elective abortions.
Not to put too fine a point on
it: The common ground that President Obama and
Third Way seek for the pro-life movement is the
burial ground.
Mr. Saletan's statement that
Ryan has stood up for unborn life, vote after
vote after vote after vote, regrettably does not
comport with Mr. Ryan's actual voting record.
Early in his congressional career, Ryan cast
some pro-life votes and some pro-abortion votes.
(As an example of the latter, in 2004 he voted
to repeal the ban on elective abortions in U.S.
military facilities.) Since 2007, however, Mr.
Ryan's record has not been mixed -- he did not
cast a single pro-life vote in 2007, 2008, or
2009. Ryan's most recent abortion-related vote
occurred in the House Appropriations Committee
on July 7, 2009, when he voted against all the
real pro-lifers and in favor of repealing the
longstanding ban on funding elective abortions,
with funds appropriated by Congress, in the
District of Columbia. Ryan advocates letting
D.C. (a federal jurisdiction) pay for abortion
on demand, with funds appropriated by Congress,
under a paper bookkeeping scheme. The result, if
enacted, will be the funding of 4,000 or 5,000
abortions annually with congressionally
appropriated funds, including about 1,000
abortions a year that would not happen
otherwise. In a subsequent press interview, Ryan
said, This bill doesn't provide public funding
for abortions, a transparent falsehood; all D.C.
funds are appropriated by Congress.
Ryan got his friend, Rep.
Kendrick Meek (D-Fl.), to sign his July 21
letter to Pelosi, another illustration of the
complete phoniness of this initiative. Meek has
been in the House since 2003 and he has never,
ever cast a pro-life vote on any
abortion-related issue -- not even on
partial-birth abortion, parental notification,
or fetal homicide. He's voted on the other side
more than 30 times. In fact, as a member of the
House Ways and Means Committee, Meek actually
voted against the amendments to remove abortion
mandates and abortion subsidies from the
Obama-backed health care bill, on July 16-17.
Obviously, Ryan and Meek are
confident that many journalists will accept
their self-chosen characterizations on any given
day of the week, without really checking their
records or their credentials. It appears that
this confidence is often well founded. In fact,
the entire Third Way false flag strategy relies
heavily on this sort of willing gullibility that
many journalists are willing to adopt on certain
issues.
It should be noted that the
organization called Democrats for Life of
America, not generally described as a militant
group, kicked Ryan off their advisory board last
year -- and no, it wasn't because he supports
contraception.
Anyone interested in seeing
Mr. Ryan's complete record on NRLC-scored House
floor votes can go to
http://nrlc.www.capwiz.com/bio/id/30639&lvl=C&chamber=H.
Click on the Votes tab, then click on More Key
Votes.
The same sort of display can
easily be obtained for Meek or for any other
incumbent member of Congress, simply by entering
the lawmaker's last name into the search tool.
By the way, there is an
omnibus abortion reduction bill that has been
languishing in the Democratic-controlled
Congress for months, the Pregnant Women Support
Act (H.R. 2035, S. 1032), sponsored by
Congressman Lincoln Davis (D-Tn.) and 39 others,
and by Senators Bob Casey (D-Pa.) and Ben Nelson
(D-Ne.). That bill does not contain any
restrictions on abortion, but there are sections
that recognize that there exists such an entity
as an unborn child, which makes the bill
unacceptable to pro-abortion advocacy groups.
Part One |