|
"Now Part of Your Important Work is to Change Minds…"
Part Two of Two
Editor's note. The following are excerpts from former Bush
Chief Political Advisor Karl Rove's address to NRLC 2008.
I want to say happy Fourth of July to you. We're meeting on the 232nd
anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. I have, in my office at
home, a framed copy of the Declaration that my father gave me when I was
four years old. Abraham Lincoln, when he was on his way to Washington in
February of 1861, stopped in Philadelphia and gave a short set of remarks in
Independence Hall; and he said there, I think something that a lot of
Americans--and I think everyone in the room--agrees with, he said, "I have
never had a feeling politically that did not spring from the sentiments
embodied in the Declaration of Independence." It's one of the two great
documents of our American civic religion. Regardless of what your religious
faith is, or your creed, or your race, or your gender, or your
birthplace--we believe in two great documents: the Constitution, I carry a
copy wherever I go, "we the people of the United States," and the
Declaration of Independence, "we hold these truths to be self-evident, that
all men are created equal, that they're endowed by their creator with
certain and unalienable rights. Among which are life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness." It's great to among people who are honoring the
Fourth of July and honoring the Declaration by a life of commitment to the
greatest of those rights, the right of life. ...
I've gotten to know Darla [St. Martin], and Doug [Johnson], and David [O'Steen]
over the last ten years and seven of those years I had an office in a very
small building at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, you may have heard of it, the
West Wing. And we worked together on a lot of important issues, and I want
to thank you for all that you've done to put this president into office and
to sustain him and work with him once he got into office. I think you will
agree with me, this is a president who is deeply and passionately committed
to the goal that you have, which is to foster a culture of life in our
country. He has been forthright and clear and deliberate in his rhetoric,
and he has been courageous in his actions. He has built a record of more
concrete achievements on behalf of life then any president in the history of
our country.
It started virtually his first day in office with the reinstitution of the
Mexico City policy. He was proud to sign into law one of your greatest
accomplishments, the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act. He was proud to not
only sign into law, but then he successfully defended before the courts of
the United States of America all the way up to the United States Supreme
Court, the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Then he signed the Unborn Victims
of Violence Act, and he appointed judges to the federal bench, district
bench, the appellate bench, into the Supreme Court who will not interpret
the law, but instead strictly apply the law as written in the Constitution;
they will not legislate from the bench. We've also worked with you to
advocate other majors [initiatives], which have not yet passed Congress. But
by working for them, and fighting for them, and talking about them, and
persuading people to support them, we'll get them. ...
Now part of your important work is to change minds. It's been patient and
difficult and vital work of persuasion that you've been about and you're to
be applauded for it. Because you've stuck in there good years and bad years,
in successful battles and unsuccessful battles--keeping focused on the goal
which is to persuade Americans to join us in protecting a culture of life.
You worked to create a climate that welcomes every child into this world and
protects every child in law; and that's required the life movement to be
active in law, in politics, in debate, in dialogue, and in legislation. ...
I'll leave it up to you to decide whether or not you agree with Darla's
characterization of him [pro-abortion Senator Barack Obama] as being the
most pro-abortion candidate the Democrats have put forward. ... But I do
know the facts of his record and his statements. I know what those are. When
the Supreme Court upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act in Gonzales
v. Carhart, Senator Obama quickly went up to the microphones and said,
"I am extremely concerned that this ruling will embolden state legislatures
to enact further measures to restrict a woman's right to choose, and that
the conservative Supreme Court justices will look for other opportunities to
erode Roe v. Wade." I hope he's right. ...
Now, admittedly he hasn't been on the national stage all that long. He was
elected to United States Senate and took the oath of office in January 2005
and he's been there, by my calculations, for about 144 days worth of
business in the United States Senate. But he's got a record on abortion
that's pretty big for a short period of time in a newcomer. He's a
co-sponsor of the "Freedom of Choice Act," which would legalize
partial-birth abortion and nullify federal and state limitations on
abortion, including parental notification laws and waiting periods. He
wants, by the passage of one federal law, to strike down all the good work
that you've done over decades.
He opposes the Hyde Amendment, prohibiting the use of taxpayer funding of
abortion through Medicare. Now this is a man who stands up and says he is
going to bring Republicans and Democrats together, conservatives and
liberals together, to achieve great things for the country. And if you want
to bring the nation together, how can you claim to do that, if you are at
the same time supporting the indefensible practice of using taxpayer dollars
to fund abortion?
You can't! You cannot square that circle. You cannot do that and live up to
the promise that you made to bring the country together.
He voted to block a bill requiring a doctor performing an abortion to notify
the parent before performing the abortion on a child from out of state.
Didn't even believe that a parent, whose child has left the state and gone
to an adjoining or another state, should have the right to know what their
child was doing…
He voted against an amendment to allow states to provide S-CHIP insurance
for an unborn child, for a woman who was pregnant. He didn't want a
children's health insurance program to be able to cover that infant--the
most vulnerable among us. And this advocate of extending health care every
which way he can said no, this is one instance I'm not in favor of allowing
the S-CHIP program to cover an unborn child.
He voted to expand stem cell research to embryos donated from in vitro
fertilization clinics regardless of the dates the stem cells were derived
from the embryos; he wanted to encourage the destruction of human life for
medical research. Since being elected to the Senate in 2004 he's got a zero
rating from this group and a 100% rating from NARAL. That's pretty hard to
do at 144 days or 145 days of Senate-conducted business.
Of course he was also in the Illinois state Senate; we ought to look at his
record there. He voted against a Born-Alive Infant Protection Act in the
Illinois state Senate that was similar to the federal law. ... In Illinois
he voted against prohibiting taxpayer dollars from being used for abortions.
He wanted to make it possible for the state to fund abortions and he called
for the passage of a state [embryonic] stem cell research bill.
Now I know that in this election he understands that he's got a record way
out on the fringe and so he's sitting down with people just trying to
convince them that he's a reasonable person, to have a dialogue with
pro-life and values leaders. I understand what he's trying to do; in fact he
was rather explicit about it. His campaign said we want people to understand
they have nothing to fear from Obama if he were president. Well there's a
difference between talk and action, and in this instance, his actions over
the years are far more important than any reassuring words that he could
offer in a private conversation.
He's pro-abortion and not pro-life. We saw the difference between him and
his opponent in the dialogue and discussion about Supreme Court nominees.
Senator Obama opposed both Justice [John] Roberts and Justice [Samuel]
Alito--and John McCain voted for both Justice Roberts and Justice Alito.
John McCain on abortion has received a 100% rating from this organization.
He is pro-life, not only in his votes, and not only his words, but also in
his personal actions. ...
[W]hat we've got to do in this election, if we believe in a culture of life,
is to use every moment that we can to use those [social] networks and to use
the power that we have as individuals, with people who depend on us for
advice and counsel, to make the quiet and persuasive case that every child
ought to be welcomed in life and protected in law. Thank you for all that
you do for our cause. May God bless the United States of America.
|