Smith, Lipinski, Pitts
Speak Out Against Taxpayer Funds for Abortion
Part Three of Four
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Government
funding for abortion and legislative plans to stop it were the
topics of a bipartisan press conference Thursday by
Reps. Chris Smith (R-NJ)
and Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.), co-chairs of the Bipartisan
Congressional Pro-Life Caucus, and Rep. Joe Pitts (R-Pa.),
Chairman of the Health Subcommittee on Energy and Commerce and
the Values Action Team.
Specifically, the
lawmakers focused on two bills introduced January 20 prohibiting
government funding for abortion--the "No Taxpayer Funding for
Abortion Act," which will be introduced as H.R. 3, and the
"Protect Life Act."
Congressman Smith (NJ-04)
said of the bills: "Today with the full and unequivocal support
of Speaker Boehner and Majority Leader Cantor, more than 150
Members of Congress have joined us to introduce the No Taxpayer
Funding for Abortion Act--a government wide prohibition on
taxpayer subsidization for abortion and conscience protections
with durable remedies. President Obama has said he wants
abortion to be rare. To Mr. Obama I say, 'here is a bill for
you.' Even the Guttmacher Institute, the former research arm of
Planned Parenthood, confirms that taxpayer funding bans are a
proven abortion reduction method. According to Guttmacher,
studies show that when abortion is not publicly funded,
abortions in the covered population are reduced by roughly 25
percent."
Congressman Dan Lipinski
(IL-03) said: "The health care law made it clear that the
current way we prevent taxpayer funding of abortion through
annual riders is dangerously fragile. We must take action to
prevent federal funding for abortion under the health care law
and throughout the government, without exception. I'm looking
forward to working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle
to guarantee we abide by a principle supported by the
overwhelming majority of Americans: that no federal taxpayer
dollars should be used to pay for abortion.
Congressman Joe Pitts
(PA-16) said: "It is imperative that the federal government
stays out of the business of subsidizing the morally
objectionable practice of abortion. President Obama, himself,
agreed with these goals, and even issued an Executive Order.
Part Four
Part One
Part Two |