|
NRLC urges "yes" vote on H.R. 2 to repeal
Obama health care law
Part Two of Four
Dear Member of Congress:
On behalf of the National Right to Life
Committee (NRLC), the nationwide federation
of state right-to-life organizations, we
urge you to vote in favor of the repeal of
Public Law 111-148, the "Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act," when repeal
legislation (H.R. 2) comes before the House
of Representatives on January 12.
As enacted, the PPACA contains multiple
provisions authorizing federal subsidies for
abortion, and additional provisions on which
future abortion-expanding regulatory
mandates may be based. Many of
the abortion-subsidizing provisions of the
legislation are detailed in an
NRLC affidavit posted on our website
here, and further documented in other
materials posted here.
In addition, the PPACA contains multiple
provisions that will, if fully
implemented, result in
government-imposed rationing of
lifesaving medical care. Among the most
dangerous:
• The department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) will be empowered to
impose so-called "quality and
efficiency" measures on health care
providers, based on recommendations by
the Independent Payment Advisory Board,
which is directed to force private
health care spending below the rate of
medical inflation. In many cases
treatment that a doctor and patient deem
needed or advisable to save that
patient’s life or preserve or improve
the patient’s health but which runs
afoul of the imposed standards will be
denied, even if the patient wants to pay
for it.
• The law empowers HHS to prevent older
Americans from making up with their own
funds for the $555 billion the law cuts
from Medicare by refusing to permit
senior citizens the choice of
private-fee-for-service plans whose
premiums are sufficient to provide
unrationed care but which HHS, in its
unlimited discretion, disallows. The
Obama health care law could thus lead to
elimination of the only way that seniors
will have to escape rationing -- by
limiting their right to spend their own
money to save their own lives.
• The law instructs and authorizes
state bureaucrats to limit the value of
the insurance policies that Americans
may purchase. Not only will the
exchanges exclude policies from
competing in an exchange when government
authorities do not agree with their
premiums, but the exchanges will even
exclude insurers whose plans outside the
exchange offer consumers the ability to
reduce the danger of treatment denial by
spending what those government
authorities claim to be an "excessive or
unjustified" amount. This will create a
"chilling effect," deterring insurers
who hope to compete within the exchanges
from offering adequately funded plans
even outside of them, so that consumers
will find it increasingly difficult to
obtain health insurance that offers
adequate and unrationed health care.
Detailed information on these and other
components that will result in rationing
is available
here.
To summarize: The law is so riddled with
provisions that violate right-to-life
principles that it cannot simply be
patched. It must be repealed, and any
replacement legislation must contain all
necessary safeguards for the right to life
of the most vulnerable members of the human
family.
NRLC intends to include the roll call on
passage of H.R. 2 in our scorecard of key
right-to-life roll calls of the 112th
Congress.
If you have questions regarding the
abortion-related aspects of the law that are
not answered in the material referenced
above, please contact the NRLC Federal
Legislation Department at 202-626-8820 or at
federallegislation@nrlc.org. If you
have questions regarding the rationing
issues associated with the law, please
contact the NRLC Powell Center for Medical
Ethics at 202-378-6683 or at
MedEthics@nrlc.org.
Respectfully,
David N. O'Steen, Ph.D
NRLC Executive Director
Douglas Johnson
NRLC Legislative Director
Burke Balch, J.D.
Director
|
|