Looking….and Looking
Part One of
Two
Part Two is an excerpt from
an article by Wesley Smith that
talks about the death of Terri
Schiavo. Please send your
comments and observations to
daveandrusko@gmail.com.
I'd missed both pieces (about
President Obama's supposed "33%
completion" rate on his promises
about abortion and a video
produced by the National Journal
titled "Abortion Rights
Advocates Look for Dynamic
Leader to Re-Energize Movement")
when they came out earlier this
week. But the issues are very
timely.
 |
|
Pro-Abortion President
Barack Obama |
Writing for National Journal
Theresa Poulson concludes,
"President Obama's reputation as
an advocate for abortion rights
will likely rest on health care
reform, despite his progress
thus far in fulfilling related
campaign promises. After a
closely fought debate over the
overhaul bill, it appears Obama
will be sent legislation
containing language that would
restrict insurance coverage for
abortions."
Huh? No wonder he's getting only
33%. (Poulson is trying to make
the case that Obama has already
bent" on abortion.) If he is
given the opportunity, Obama
would sign off on language which
does precisely the opposite and
then trumpet it as a
"compromise."
She does a better job outlining
how Obama gutted the pro-life
"Mexico City" policy,
re-established funding for the
dreaded United Nations
Population Fund, and favored
removing a longstanding ban on
the use of congressionally
appropriated funds to pay for
abortions in the District of
Columbia, a federal
jurisdiction. There is a lot
more she didn't discuss which
Obama doubtless will promote out
of conviction and to appease his
pro-abortion conviction.
Poulson also produced a video
for the National Journal under
the title, "Where's The Palin
For The Left?" The initial point
made (for contrast) is that "Palin's
appeal has given a boost to
abortion opponents."
"On the other side" (NOW
President Terry O'Neill) "is
looking for someone to step up."
She fumes, "We have pro-choice
officials going around the
country saying that abortion is
somehow a bad thing." Just after
Poulson points out a recent
decline in support for abortion
"particularly among young
people," we hear O'Neill saying.
"I call on our elected officials
to begin saying, abortion is a
good thing."
If the gap between what Poulson
attributes to Obama on abortion
and what he is trying to do is
disconnect number one,
disconnect number two is for
O'Neill to demand that abortion
be advertised as a "good thing"
at the same time support for
abortion continues to sink.
But the third and most amusing
disconnect is between the
representative pro-abortion
young college female Poulson
interviews and the "Second Wave"
feminists to whom her generation
cannot "relate." The college
student casually observes that
most of these feminists are in
their sixties and seventies, and
you can't miss that she is
annoyed that the older
pro-abortion women think her
generation is less passionately
committed.
Poulson tries to make the case
that Obama is a backslider--not
even remotely true--and O'Neill
tries to resuscitate the notion
that abortion is not only "good"
for women (not true) but a "good
thing." There is a good reason
that pro-life sentiment is
growing, particularly among
18-29 year olds.
They hear nonsense like this and
just roll their eyes in
disbelief.
Part Two |