Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' Drafted Guidelines on Abortion
Cover Up Abortion-Breast Cancer Link, Say Coalition on
Abortion/Breast Cancer, Researchers
Part Three of Three
Editor’s note. The
following commentary comes from the Coalition on Abortion/Breast
Cancer and is found at
www.abortionbreastcancer.com/press_releases/110222/index.htm
 |
Dr. Joel Brind, an expert on
the connection between abortion
and breast cancer.
|
Abortionists at the United
Kingdom's Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG)
have prepared preliminary, new guidelines on The Care of Women
Requesting Induced Abortion that say, "Women should be informed
that induced abortion is not associated with an increase in
breast cancer." [1]
"Do they read standard
medical texts at the RCOG?" asked Karen Malec, president of the
Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer. "Increased childbearing,
starting at a younger age, and increased duration of
breastfeeding sharply reduce breast cancer risk. The woman
choosing abortion has a greater risk than the one choosing to
give birth.
"The RCOG's guidelines
cite a review that says, 'Failure to provide this information is
a direct threat to maternal autonomy, diminishing a woman's
ability to give informed consent.' [2] The loss of the
protective effect is only one of three breast cancer risks
associated with induced abortion," said Mrs. Malec.
The guidelines acknowledge
a "small increase in risk of subsequent preterm birth, which
increases with the number of abortions." [3] Brent Rooney, a
researcher in this field, called the RCOG's use of the word,
"small," "the language of cover-up."
"Two Americans and three
Australians have successfully sued their doctors for failing to
warn about the risks of breast cancer and emotional harm," said
Mrs. Malec. "It would serve them right at the RCOG to be sued
for malpractice."
The closing date for
healthcare officials to submit their consultations on the
guidelines to the RCOG is February 26, 2011.
International experts on
the abortion-breast cancer link have submitted their
consultations. They include Professor Joel Brind (Deputy Chair
for Biology and Environmental Sciences at Baruch College, City
University of New York) and Patrick Carroll (a statistician and
actuary from Pension and Population Research Institute in
London). Read their submissions and a discussion of the RCOG's
preliminary guidelines in the following commentary [www.abortionbreastcancer.com/download/COMMENTARY_ON_RCOG.pdf].
The Coalition on
Abortion/Breast Cancer is an international women's organization
founded to protect the health and save the lives of women by
educating and providing information on abortion as a risk factor
for breast cancer.
References:
1. Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, "The Care of Women Requesting
Induced Abortion," Peer Review Draft, January 2011, p. 16, Ch.
2, No. 625 and see Recommendation 40, p. 47, No. 2060. Available
at:
http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/care-women-requesting-induced-abortion
2. Thorp JM, Hartmann KE,
Shadigian EM. Long-term physical and psychological health
consequences of induced abortion: A review of the evidence.
Obstet & Gynecol Survey 2003;58:1. Available at:
http://www.ncrtl.org/images/concept/evidencereview.pdf
3. Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, "The Care of Women Requesting
Induced Abortion," Peer Review Draft, January 2011, p. 16, Ch.
2, No. 631-32. Available at:http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/care-women-requesting-induced-abortion
Part One
Part Two |