Sen. Bayh Announces He Will Not
Seek Third Term
Part One of
Two
By Dave Andrusko
Part Two is a quick reminder
there is still time to register
for NRLC's Summer Academy.
Please send your comments on any
or all parts to
daveandrusko@gmail.com.
If you'd like, follow me on
http://twitter.com/daveha.
Well, when it rains, it pours.
In an announcement that nobody
saw coming, Indiana Democratic
Senator Evan Bayh announced
today that he is hanging up his
senatorial cleats. A man who has
never lost an election
attributed his decision not to
an increasingly volatile
political climate--"Even in the
current challenging environment,
I am confident in my prospects
for re-election"--but to a
waning desire to serve in
Congress.
 |
|
Sen. Evan Bayh (D) will
not seek re-election |
However it is also true that
Bayh's decision comes less than
two weeks after former Indiana
Republican Senator Dan Coats
indicated he would be running.
While unnamed aides told any
reporter who would listen that
Bayh was comfortably ahead of
Coats, Chuck Dodd, NBC News
Chief White House correspondent,
remarked, "it's not going
unnoticed that Coats ducked Bayh
in '98; Now Bayh ['s] ducking
Coats."
As is always the case, context
is everything--in this case a
trifecta of bad news for
pro-abortion Democrats over the
last month.
The 54-year-old Bayh, a former
Indiana secretary of state and
two-term governor, dropped his
surprising news only a month
after the even more surprising
election of Republican Scott
Brown in Massachusetts. Not only
did this deprive Senate
Democrats of a filibuster-proof
majority, adding insult to
injury for Democrats, Brown was
replacing the late Sen. Teddy
Kennedy.
Bayh's announcement also follows
on the heels of the
not-unexpected retirement of
scandal-ridden Sen. Chris Dodd
(D-Conn.) and the largely
unexpected retirement of Sen.
Byron Dorgan(D-N.D.).
Indiana is considered a
Republican-leaning state, a
handicap which Bayh overcame
with a reputation as a
"moderate" and initially by
being the son of former Indiana
Senator Birch Bayh.
To retake control of the Senate,
Republicans would need a net
gain of ten seats in the
November 2010 elections.
Part Two |