A More
In-Depth Account of the Meeting
Between Pope Benedict and Nancy
Pelosi...
Part Two of Two
By Dave Andrusko
Editor's
note. Please send your thoughts
and observations to
daveandrusko@gmail.com
Hats off to
Fox News. Granted, I could
not have read all the stories
about pro-abortion Speaker of
the House Nancy Pelosi's visit
yesterday with Pope Benedict
XVI, but I read a lot of them.
None came near the
comprehensiveness of Fox
News's account which put the
15-minute meeting at Vatican
City in a meaningful context.
All of the
stories addressed the obvious
limitation. No reporters were
allowed in so what happened was
private. All we know for sure is
what was in the statements
issued first by the Vatican and
then later by Pelosi's office.
Pelosi's boilerplate comments
need not detain us.
As for the
visit from the Pope's
perspective, by and large the
stories I read were minor
variations of "The Vatican
released the pope's remarks to
Pelosi, saying Benedict spoke of
the church's teaching 'on the
dignity of human life from
conception to natural death.'
That is an expression often used
by the pope when expressing
opposition to abortion." Fox
News went much further,
quoting extensively from the
Vatican's statement.
"His Holiness
took the opportunity to speak of
the requirements of the natural
moral law and the Church's
consistent teaching on the
dignity of human life from
conception to natural death
which enjoins all Catholics,
and especially legislators,
jurists and those responsible
for the common good of society,
to work in cooperation with all
men and women of good will in
creating a just system of laws
capable of protecting human life
at all stages of its
development.' (My emphasis.)
Even a
non-Catholic, like myself, can
easily grasp what's being
asserted and its significance
for a ardent pro-abortionist
like Pelosi who in an appearance
on "Meet the Press" last
August described herself as an
"ardent, practicing Catholic."
And that is that whatever our
religious convictions (or if we
have none at all), we can all
understand the moral injunction
to honor the dignity of human
life from conception to natural
death AND that those who are in
key positions have a special
obligation to nurture the kind
of legal system that enfolds all
members of the human community
within its protection.
Fox News also
did a very nice job reminding
its readers of three other key
points. (1) "The pontiff has a
long history of urging Catholic
politicians to toe the line on
abortion." (2) "In 2002, the
Vatican issued a doctrinal note
on 'The Participation of
Catholics in Political Life,'
which states rather succinctly
that politicians who profess to
be Catholic have a 'grave and
clear obligation' to oppose any
law that attacks human life."
And (3) in
that same "Meet the Press"
interview, Pelosi audaciously
asserted that the Catholic
Church had been inconsistent
(when it hadn't just punted) on
the question of when life
begins. There was a strong
suggestion that it was not until
very recently that the Catholic
Church really took abortion
seriously and, in any event
(according to Pelosi), "the
point is, that it shouldn't have
an impact on the woman's right
to choose."
This set off
of what Fox News
described as a "verbal slugfest
with American bishops." A much
better characterization would
have been that Pelosi's
egregious misrepresentation of
Church teaching had to be
corrected.
Among others,
Denver Archbishop Charles J.
Chaput did so. In a letter to
his flock, he wrote, "Ardent,
practicing Catholics will
quickly learn from the
historical record that from
apostolic times, the Christian
tradition overwhelmingly held
that abortion was grievously
evil." (See
www.nrlc.org/News_and_Views/Aug08/nv082608Part2.html)
A tip of the
hat to Fox News for fair
and balanced coverage.
Part One |