Further Reflections on
Abortionist Pierre Renelique
Part One of Two
"Wow, I am in shock! That is the
most despicable thing I ever heard of!"
Typical of the many responses to Monday's edition of
TN&V.
Yesterday my associate Liz
Townsend wrote about the heart-rending,
stomach-turning case of Baby Shanice Denise
Osbourne, who survived an abortion in July 20,
2006 at 23-weeks of age. According to the
Florida Department of Health, after the mother,
18-year-old Sycloria Williams, "delivered the
baby, one of the owners of the clinic, Ms. [Belkis]
Gonzales came into the room and cut the
umbilical cord with scissors. Ms. Gonzales then
proceeded to place the baby and all of its
remains in a plastic bag. She then closed the
bag and placed it in a trashcan."
An exclamation point, of
sorts, follows: "Staff members did not call
'911' or a neonatologist after [Williams]
delivered the baby" and she "received no medical
aid after delivering the baby."
 |
Abortionist
Pierre Jean-Jacques Renelique,
right, and his attorney, Joseph
Harrison.
|
Yesterday's story dealt with
the Florida Board of Medicine decision last
Friday to revoke the license of abortionist
Pierre Jean-Jacque Renelique. The board upheld
the Department of Health allegations that he
falsified medical records, inappropriately
delegated tasks to unlicensed personnel and
committed malpractice. Ms. Williams had "planned
to have an abortion but instead gave birth to a
baby," according to CNN.
Williams has sued Renelique,
the clinic and its staff , seeking damages. She
alleges in her suit that "she witnessed the
murder of her daughter" and said she "sustained
severe emotional distress, shock and psychic
trauma which have resulted in discernible bodily
injury."
But there is much more to the
story. And all of it can be found in the 20-page
Administrative Complaint filed by the Department
of Health. (You can read it for yourself at
http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/02/06/renelinque.pdf).
Let me just mention four
considerations, all taken from the
Administrative Complaint.
First, there were "no disputed
issues of material fact" because Renelique
"failed to answer the department request within
35 days." As a result an administrative laws
judge "entered an order deeming all of the
allegations in the Administrative Complaint
admitted by Respondent [Renelique]."
Second, while an MD, Renelique
is not board certified in any practice,
according to the Complaint, "but he practices in
obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN)--abortion
medicine." There were also no licensed staff at
the clinic where the abortion took place
Third, Renelique admitted,
according to the Complaint, "that he was
contacted by clinic staff multiple times" the
day of the abortion. Everything happened to
Williams and her baby before Renelique arrived
at the abortion clinic. But he concocted an
elaborate story about his alleged involvement in
the abortion. "In fact," the Complaint
matter-of-factly states, "Respondent prepared a
false medical record when he knew what had
actually happened."
Fourth, there were six
specific instances of misconduct which resulted
in a conclusion that Renelique had practiced
medical malpractice. In summary, "Dr.
Renelique's failure to practice medicine with
that level of care, skill and treatment that is
recognized as being acceptable, as well as his
willingness to falsify medical records, poses a
serious and immediate danger to the public," the
health department said.
The reason any of this came to
light, according to the Department of Health, is
a series of anonymous tips, which began a day
after the baby's death. Then, a week later,
following a third tip, police obtained a third
search warrant "and finally found the partially
decomposed fetal remains in a cardboard box." An
autopsy "revealed that the lungs floated in
water. This fact indicated that the fetus had
filled its lungs with air prior to its death."
The Medical Examiner listed the cause of death
"as 'extreme prematurity.'"
As you read the suit filed by
Williams, the sheer unmistakable madness of the
scene comes across vividly. "The staff began
screaming and pandemonium ensued," according to
the suit. "Sycloria watched in horror and shock
as her baby writhed with her chest rising and
falling as she breathed."
Frankly, this is so horrific,
I can't wrap my mind around it.
As I read the CNN story, which
was quite helpful in places, I couldn't help but
shake my head when the writer got off into a
discussion of how likely a baby at that age
would have needed "oxygen, other medical help
and mechanical assistance to help them breathe,"
and the suggestion that she would have had
significant health problems.
Talk about missing the point!
Please send your comments to
daveandrusko@gmail.com
Part Two --
Blogging
From the National Religious
Broadcasters Convention |