Editor's note. Please send your thoughts to
daveandrusko@hotmail.com.
When I read accounts that are so hard-hearted they make my blood run
cold, I've learned that it's important to read them carefully and
through to the end. A good part of a story such as, "Abortion is never
an easy option: Why I aborted my first child" displays such callousness
that had I not finished this disturbing account of the abortion of a
baby with Down syndrome I would have missed something important . [You
can read the story at
www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/you/article.html?in_article_id=513058&in_page_id=1908].
Katherine Mobey aborted her first baby six years ago. The introduction
to her account, which ran in the Daily Mail, tells us it was "a
traumatic decision that took their marriage to breaking point." It's
easy to see why.
Early
on she learns from the sonographer that her baby has
exomphalos – "a rare condition in which part of the intestine grows
outside the body"--which can be corrected by surgery. She is also told
her baby may have Down's and further tests are taken. At that point
she'd realized "my relationship with my baby had changed."
"Every pregnant woman wants the little person growing inside her to be
perfect--but my dreams had turned into a fearful vision. " An
understandable reaction.
Then she gets the call from
the midwife. "As soon as she told me it was bad news, I broke down," Mobey
writes. "The baby was seriously affected by Down's as well as the
intestinal complications. We didn't know what its life expectancy would
be or what medical treatment it would need, but we did know that we
would not be able to cope with a severely disabled child. Going ahead
with the pregnancy wasn't even up for discussion. Neil [her husband]
stayed strong and made all the necessary arrangements."
At
roughly 16 weeks, they couldn't have known their baby would be "severely
disabled." What she did know was her "dream" baby had become, for her, a
"nightmare." (Later in her story, Mobey tells us, "My third irrational
but very real feeling was that my body had been contaminated by having a
sickly child in my womb.")
After
the abortion, Mobey is told she can hold the baby. "But I couldn't do
it--hold the dead and deformed being that had been inside me." By this
point it's become increasingly difficult on any reader not predisposed
to her "choice" to continue.
Then
we have two sentiments that would appear diametrical opposite, but on
further reflection perhaps not.
"On
his way back, Neil saw someone taking away the baby in a bundle of
tissue down the corridor--presumably to the incinerator."
Unsurprisingly, "He often talks about that moment and it is extremely
painful for him."
But
then there is this:
"Afterwards--and I know this will sound bizarre--we were elated. Mum and
Neil were saying, 'Well done,' and relief flooded over me. For Mum, it
had meant losing a grandchild, but she was totally supportive of our
decision – her priority throughout was me."
Mobey
has told us periodically that she has paid a real price for this
"unmotherly decision." But it is not until later that she begins to
understand just how steep a price Neil had paid.
As is
not uncommon in such situations Mobey desperately wants a "replacement
baby." It was too soon for her husband but she presses, and they have a
baby girl.
She's
coped by having another baby on whom she dotes. "Having Honor was the
proof my psyche needed that my body isn't contaminated," she confesses.
Meanwhile Mobey's husband is left to his own devices. She realizes he
had been "strong" for her but that the emotional bill was coming due.
They split, later reconcile but on what appears to be shaky grounds.
Mobey
concludes with the usual the abortion "was the right decision" for her
ending. But this comes after the admission that "I still cry as though
mine were yesterday."
From
the account, it appears that Mobey talked herself into believing the
worst about her baby and the worst about her and her husband's capacity
to be parents of a baby with disabilities.
It
apparently never crossed her mind that someone would adopt a baby with
Down syndrome, or that her mother's and her husband's "bizarre"
reaction--saying "Well done" after the abortion--could well have been
their poorly-worded attempt to show solidarity with a decision she
wanted desperately to make but they did not.
Abortion not only kills defenseless babies, it often stifles, when it
does not extinguish, relationships strained to the breaking point.
That's important to remember when we reach out to post-aborted women.
If we
look closely, there may well be others near by hurting every bit as much
as her.
Please
send any comments to Daveandrusko@hotmail.com.