66 babies in a year left to die after
abortions "go wrong" in Great Britain
"Guidance from the Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommends babies over 22 weeks which
survive abortion should have their hearts stopped by lethal injection but
this can be a difficult procedure for doctors."
Daily Mail, February 4.
As we've discussed a number of times,
Great Britain's abortion law takes dead aim at babies up to the age of 24
weeks and then offers a loophole big enough to legitimize the execution of
older babies essentially up to birth. All the child need have is a "severe
foetal abnormality," which has and does include babies prenatally diagnosed
with cleft palates and club feet.
With the deadly sweep this broad, it
should surprise no one that a few babies will be old enough and tough enough
to survive the abortionist's onslaught. Alas, equally unsurprising is the
attitude of the nation's medical establishment: if they survive, kill them.
The Daily Mail noted that the
startling statistics can be found in the small print of an official report
of the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH),
commissioned by the British Government. The numbers are for hospitals in
England and Wales for the year 2005.
The Daily Mail reports that 16 of the
66 survivors were 22 weeks or older. These older babies "survived between
one minute and four-and-a-half hours," the Daily Mail reported, and "half
lived for just over an hour."
Of the remaining 50 abortion
survivors, "half survived for longer than 55 minutes, with one breathing
unaided for ten hours," reported the Daily Mail.
According to CEMACH chief executive
Richard Congdon, the older babies were not given lethal injections, although
that is the course of action recommended by the Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. He said the babies' deaths were
"inevitable."
As we discussed Friday, almost 200,000
babies are aborted each year in Britain, with the numbers continuing to
climb. Members of the British Parliament will soon debate the status of
abortion law for the first time since 1990.
At a minimum, pro-lifers have sought
to use the discussion to attempt to rein in the nation's laissez faire
abortion law. Pro-abortionists want to make it even easier for women to
abort, a.k.a. increase the number of dead babies.
This latest revelation about abortion
survivors is set against a backdrop of a number of developments making
pro-abortionists, if not squirm, at least shout their usual nonsense louder.
To cite just the most recent, survival rates for babies born between 22 and
25 weeks rose from 32% in 1981 to 71% in 2000 at one hospital that was
geared and equipped to handle their special needs.
According to the Canadian pro-life
website www.lifesite.com,
"CEMACH was launched in 2003 by the National Institute for Health and
Clinical Excellence (NICE) to inquire 'into the deaths of mothers, babies
and children.' NICE is the British government's bioethics think tank that
publishes clinical appraisals for the National Health Service about whether
particular treatments are worthwhile to pursue. "The
NICE is guided by the modern principles of utilitarian bioethics and bases
its decisions primarily on whether a treatment is cost-effective. In 2005,
the NICE issued guidelines that said elderly patients should be refused some
treatments if doctors felt they would not be 'of benefit' because of the
patient's age."
We can only hope and pray that ears
will be unstopped, eyes opened, and hearts softened.
Tomorrow we will discuss in a
preliminary way what happened today in "Super Tuesday." |