|
Do You See What I See?
By Dave Andrusko
Editor's note. With
only minor alterations, this edition has run as our Christmas
Eve TN&V for years and years. When it first ran more than a
decade ago, it garnered more response than any article we've
ever run. I hope our many new TN&V readers find it a blessing
and longtime readers rediscover its charm. If you have thoughts,
please send them to
daveandrusko@gmail.com. Merry Christmas from the Andruskos.
"Today human relations are
irregulars and seconds at the closing days of the warehouse sale
of life."
-- From the book, "Social Amnesia," by Russell Jacoby
"O little town of
Bethlehem."
-- Traditional Christmas carol
It
was late in the afternoon the Saturday after Thanksgiving. My
wife, Lisa, and I had established a temporary safe haven in our
kitchen free from the usual chaos that comes with the presence
of four joyfully rambunctious children. We'd somehow managed to
wrest free a few minutes just to read the paper, enjoy a cup of
coffee together, and chat. It was nice!
For reasons I did not
fully understand at the time, when I read in our local paper
that the Salvation Army was experiencing a dramatic shortage in
volunteer bell ringers to man its familiar red kettles, I was so
shocked I jumped up from the table and searched out the local
number.
Violet, the gentle lady
who answered, mistakenly thought I was someone inquiring about a
paid position. When I assured her otherwise, she was so
pathetically grateful for my willingness to help them help the
poor a wave of shame washed over me.
How many times, I thought
guiltily, had I brushed past these magnanimous folks, who
patiently waited for some sign my heart was a few degrees warmer
than the freezing temperature outside? How many times had I been
so self-absorbed that these devoted volunteers simply blended
into the brick facades behind them?
I was mortified when I
recall that even though I had occasionally given money, never
once had I emerged from my self-absorption long enough to
actually "see" them, let alone grasp what their silent vigil
stood for. Because I had always looked through them, they never
really existed for me. I hastily volunteered for several
assignments. (In what was surely a feeble attempt at expiation,
I made sure that one of them was on my birthday.)
The moral of this story
needn't be belabored to tenderhearted pro-lifers.
When our culture "looks"
at the vulnerable, all too often there is a failure to recognize
and therefore an inability to reach out in love and compassion.
This is never more true than in our treatment of the unborn, the
littlest Americans.
However, it wasn't just
because of the news account and the subsequent phone call that I
saw these kindly souls with new eyes. I was already predisposed,
if you will, because Christmas was approaching, to Christians
the celebration of the birth of the Messiah.
Even those who do not
share our faith honor Jesus for his unconditional love for
widows and orphans, the sick, and the social outcast, his loving
admonition to care for the least among us. This most assuredly
included little children, as Luke's poignant gospel account
reminds us so beautifully.
Jesus healed out of a deep
well of empathy and compassion. He restored many whose bodies,
hearts, and souls were weighed down with terrible physical and
emotional burdens. But he was also teaching us a timeless
lesson: unless we are willing to open our eyes, we, too, will be
blind to the hurting around us.
While it is not my
intention to idealize pro-lifers, it would be false modesty to
ignore that they demonstrate a tremendous capacity to truly
"see" what others either cannot, or choose not, to see. It is no
accident that pro-lifers defend unborn babies. Love and concern
for the downtrodden, the dispossessed, and the marginalized is
what gives their lives a rich unity of purpose.
The great hope of the
pro-life movement is that despite our nation's descents into
inhumanity and indifference, the self-image of Americans is
deservedly of a good people, blessed in a unique way. And it is
because Americans are fundamentally decent people that the
significance of the debate over partial-birth abortion cannot be
exaggerated.
People needn't be anywhere
near where we are to be virtually sent reeling. Witnessing even
a simple line drawing of this abomination can turn opinions
inside out. A pseudo-serious support for "choice" in the
abstract cannot coexist for very long with the concrete reality
of this brutal assassination of helpless children. For many,
many people, head knowledge will become heart knowledge and
ambivalence will be transformed into empathy.
Our culture has chosen to
willfully suppress what it always knew - - that unborn children
are children yet to be born, a classic example of what historian
Russell Jacoby once called "social amnesia." But the monstrous
evil that is partial-birth abortion - - a procedure that is
essentially indistinguishable from infanticide - - is shearing
away the excuse people have used from the time immemorial to
explain away their complicity in evil: "I didn't know."
And because eyes are being
opened, ears unstopped, and hearts unshackled, what William
McKenna calls our "unforced revulsion" at abortion is finding a
wider audience. These telltale signs suggest we are cutting
through the static of lies and distortions, establishing a clear
channel to convey our message of love and hope for mother and
unborn child.
One day soon, the ethos of
discrimination and brutality toward the unborn will prove itself
to have been an aberration, a loathsome interim ethic. And that
glorious day will come because you have proven yourselves to be
the antidote to the poison of inhumanity, indifference, and
injustice.
Let me say, humbly, bless
you for all you have done.
Please send your comments
to
daveandrusko@gmail.com.
Part Two
Part Three |