Obama's Faltering Image and What
That Might Mean for the Battle
Ahead
Part One of Three
By Dave Andrusko
Part Two talks about a big
victory in Ireland.
Part Three offers you the
chance to purchase copies of
National Right to Life News'
January 22 Commemorative
Edition. Please send your
comments on any part to
daveandrusko@gmail.com.
If you'd like, follow me on
http://twitter.com/daveha.
"Presidential politics is about
storytelling. Presented with a
vivid storyline, voters
naturally tend to fit every new
event or piece of information
into a picture that is already
neatly framed in their minds. No
one understands this better than
Barack Obama and his team, who
won the 2008 election in part
because they were better
storytellers than the
opposition. … A year into his
presidency, however, Obama's
gift for controlling his image
shows signs of faltering. As
Washington returns to work from
the Thanksgiving holiday, there
are several anti-Obama
storylines gaining momentum."
-- From "7 stories Obama doesn't like," by John Harris,
which appeared in Politico.com
November 30.
"Abortion rights activists were
lobbying lawmakers Wednesday in
an effort to torpedo tougher
restrictions on abortion
coverage in the health care
legislation that is being
debated in the Senate. …
Wednesday's rally is being held
by the Coalition to Pass Health
Care Reform and Stop Stupak."
-- Fox News, December 2.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Whether the subject is
pro-abortion President Barack
Obama floundering in the polls
or a slew of pro-abortion
lobbyists trying to "persuade"
the Senate to do what the
leadership already is determined
to do, the common denominator is
the crucial significance of
shaping how the public
understands you and your agenda.
In one instance as the scales
begin to fall from the public's
eyes Obama is losing his ability
to mesmerize Americans. In the
other instance pro-abortionists
are seeking to turn truth on its
head by convincing the public
that it is pro-lifers, not
pro-abortionists, who are
gearing up to change the rules
of the game that have governed
abortion financing for decades.
The usual suspects--PPFA and
Alliance for Justice, for
example--are being joined in
town today by groups you would
expect (MoveOn.org), as well as
others that most people would
find surprising, such as the
YWCA!
 |
|
Pro-Abortion President
Barack Obama |
They want to make sure the
Senate health care restructuring
bill does not include the
Stupak-Pitts Amendment, which
the House adopted, and which
genuinely extends the principles
of the Hyde Amendment that
governs all of the current
federal health programs. Of
course, they are also no doubt
loudly insisting that the final
bill that comes out of any
House-Senate conference
committee is shorn of
Stupak-Pitts as well.
For single-issue pro-lifers the
piece by John Harris that ran a
few days ago in Politico makes
for fascinating reading,
although it is important to us
for reasons different than it
might be for many others. (See
www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29993.html)
Harris's primary point is that
the seven story lines "all are
serious threats to Obama, if
they gain enough currency to
become the dominant frame
through which people interpret
the president's actions and
motives." Without getting off
into a lengthy discussion, they
are an interesting amalgam of
vanity, weakness, aloofness, and
lack of fiscal discipline. But
what does mean for what we are
trying to accomplish?
Obama poses a lethal threat to
unborn children not just
because--or not even primarily
because--support for abortion on
demand is the prism through
which he evaluates the unborn
child's right to life. In one
sense he is the usual-usual
pro-abortion Democrat (albeit
made worse by a cavalier
disregard for babies born
prematurely). But in another
sense Obama is far more
dangerous because he has seduced
millions of people into
subscribing to his story that he
is going to "end the culture
wars."
If the public buys into this,
they are more likely to accept
patently insincere assurances
that he is like Horatio at the
gate--that (as he told ABC News'
Jake Tapper) "I want to make
sure...that we are not in some
way sneaking in funding for
abortions…" (Every time I watch
that interview I think of the
pickpocket whose real gift is
distracting your attention which
makes actually lifting your
wallet child's play.)
So, for us, the overriding
"storyline" is not that Obama
acts as if he is playing with
Monopoly money or that he has
way more than his share of
"self-regard." It's whether "as
the novelty of a new president
wears off," the "cult of
personality" that has grown up
around Obama runs aground.
If it does, we can hope that the
average American will no longer
be lulled into thinking Obama is
anything other than a
pro-abortion Democrat, one who
told Planned Parenthood public
policy arm in 2007 that "in my
mind, reproductive care is
essential care, basic care, so
it is at the center, the heart
of the plan that I propose."
Part Two
Part Three |