Boyfriend
Charged With Spiking Pregnant
Girlfriend's Drink with RU486
By Randall K. O'Bannon, Ph.D., NRL ETF Director
of Education & Research
Editor's
note. Please send your comments to
daveandrusko@hotmail.com.
On
September 17, 2007, Darshana Patel became
suspicious when the smoothie her boyfriend
bought her at the Appleton, Wisconsin ice cream
shop came with a white powder around the rim.
She was in the early stages of pregnancy and had
already lost a child earlier a few months
earlier – and she was concerned her boyfriend
might have had something to do with it,
according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
Feigning
illness, Patel took the smoothie back to her
office, where she worked as a family physician,
and had a sample sent to a California lab for
testing. The lab found indications of RU486, the
abortion pill, the Associated Press reported.
Patel
miscarried and lost the second child on
September 30. Though Patel never drank the
smoothie, she had eaten other food recently
prepared by her boyfriend, according to the
Journal-Sentinel.
Armed with
the test results, she notified the Outagamie
County Sheriff's office, and authorities
arrested Manishkumar Patel on Wednesday,
November 28, 2007, charging him with attempted
first-degree murder on an unborn child and a
number of other charges.
The
Journal Sentinel reported that the rationale
Manishkumar gave authorities was that he "didn't
need more babies" and "didn't want it."
Despite
having the same last name, a common Indian name,
Manishkumar was not married or related to
Darshana, though they had a three year old son
together and Manishkumar and his wife lived in a
house owned by Darshana. Manishkumar owns a
string of local gas stations and other
businesses in the Appleton area.
If
convicted of all charges, Manishkumar faces a
maximum penalty of 99 and1/2 years in prison and
a $92,000 fine. Manishkumar has been released
after posting a $750,000 bond and a court date
of January 30, 2008 has been set, according to
the Appleton Post-Crescent.
Sue
Armacost, legislative director for Wisconsin
Right to Life, credited Wisconsin's 1998 Fetal
Homicide Law in playing a key role in holding
Manishkumar accountable for his actions.
"Without Wisconsin's Fetal Homicide Law, there
would be no basis on which to charge Patel in
the death of the child," said Armacost.. "As
horrible as this situation is for the child's
mother, she can at least be comforted by the
fact that her child is recognized as a victim
under the Fetal Homicide Law and that the death
of her child is a crime in Wisconsin"
The Associated
Press reports that Manishkumar Patel admitted
that he had given his girlfriend the drug and
later told investigators he had gotten the pills
from India. A number of Indian companies sell
the drug over the internet, but the FDA has
warned Americans that unauthorized import of the
drug for personal use is both illegal and
dangerous (Drug Store News, 1/20/03,
www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/mifepristone,
accessed 12/4/07, FDA Release, 12/9/02).
Women
taking RU486 can cramp and bleed profusely, with
some having to be treated for hemorrhage. Some
taking the drug have died after contracting
rare, but lethal infections.
Alone, the
drug does not "work" all the time, so the
process is normally supplemented by a
prostaglandin, misoprostol, which stimulates
uterine contractions to expel the child.
Doctors
are supposed to monitor all steps of the process
to ensure that the abortion is complete and that
there are no serious complications. In the U.S.,
doctors are responsible for seeing that all
steps of the process are monitored.
RU486 has
not made abortion easier on women. Even under
ordinary circumstances, a chemical abortion with
RU486 can be a taxing ordeal.
Severe
cramping and extensive bleeding are normal parts
of the process, and diarrhea, vomiting, and
nausea are common side effects. A woman
undergoing an RU486 abortion bleeds more than
she would from a standard first trimester
surgical abortion, and the abortion process may
take days or even weeks, if it occurs at all.
While it comes with risks of its own, a surgical
abortion is over in a matter of minutes.
As this
case demonstrates, however, RU486 has opened
women up to a whole new form of exploitation.
While a man could subtly or not so subtly coerce
a woman to go to an abortion clinic for a
surgical abortion, it would be very difficult,
if not impossible, to perform a surgical
procedure on her without her knowledge.
Chemically induced abortions, on the other hand,
present a different option.
Chemical
abortions have given abortion clinics a chance
to make easier money, especially if they skip
the steps where women are supposed to come back
for return visits. The drug's development,
though, and the availability, in particular, of
off-brand RU486 on the internet, allows men the
opportunity to not only have their partners have
an abortion on the cheap, but to unilaterally
have unborn children they create killed without
the mother's knowledge or consent.
The
problem, of course, is abortion's being legal in
the first place, creating circumstances in which
human life can be devalued and disregarded. Once
that has been done to the unborn child, it is
only a short logical step to the dehumanization
and exploitation of others, including the
child's mother.
Neither
the idea, nor the technology, can be so easily
stuffed back inside the evil genie's pill
bottle.