Explaining Obama's Rapid
Decline
Part Three of Three
By Dave Andrusko
Whether
you are friend or foe, pro-abortion President Barack Obama's
approval numbers show no sign of bottoming out. The obvious
question is why.
Let's think about that
one, and I would appreciate it if you'd take the time to share
your thoughts at
daveandrusko@gmail.com.
But, first, am I
exaggerating how badly the President is faring, less than 19
months into his term? Well, as we discussed yesterday, Gallup
reported that "President Obama is facing his lowest job approval
ratings yet. His 44% average for the week of Aug. 9-15 and
latest three-day approval average of 42% are both the lowest of
his presidency to date."
Obama can take the long
view--he is not up for re-election until 2010--but not nervous
Democrats who face an unhappy electorate in two and half months.
Gallup's Frank Newport connected the dots for them when he
wrote, "A president's job approval ratings are related to his
party's success in midterm elections. Presidents with ratings
below 50% have seen their party lose 36 seats on average in
midterm House elections -- with a range of 11 to 55 seats lost."
In a towering understatement, Newport concludes," A continuation
of Obama's current pattern of approval ratings well below 50%
would not bode well for the Democrats this fall."
But, again, why? If you're
in the tank for him, as is Politico's Roger Simon, it's because
Obama is just too good for us. Being on the wrong side of just
about every major controversy we face proves that Obama is
Lincoln-esque. If Obama is criticized for being "off-message,"
Simon asks, what does it matter "if you are right about the
issue?"
For single-issue
pro-lifers, the response is Obama is consistent on-message and
was/is dramatically wrong on ObamaCare. As we've demonstrated
over and over again, ObamaCare represents the greatest expansion
of abortion since Roe v. Wade, compounded by the less well-known
truth that this "reform" is honeycombed with provisions that
will guarantee rationing.
Whatever their particular
grievance against ObamaCare, the American public agrees it's
terrible public policy. Rasmussen Reports informed us yesterday
that a whopping 60% either someone or strongly (50%) favor
repeal to only 36% who oppose repeal (26% strongly).
On top of that--and surely
fueling the growing numbers in favor of repeal--is that "Fifty
percent (50%) of voters now say repeal of the bill will be good
for the economy. That's up six points from the end of July and
is the highest result found since the question was first posed
in April. Twenty-six percent (26%) say repeal of the bill would
be bad for the economy, while another 15% say it will have no
impact."
To come full circle, from
our pro-life perspective, the reason Obama's approval ratings
are racing toward the 30s is that he holds positions on issues
that are squarely at odds with the sentiments of the American
people. (See Part One for a related story.)
Not just on ObamaCare, but
on so many other proposals. It includes everything from
reversing the pro-life Mexico City Policy at the beginning of
his Presidency, to trying to squelch free speech through the
DISCLOSE Act, most recently--and so many other anti-life
behavior in between.
The irony is that Obama is
criticized (with considerable justification) for approaching
incoherence when trying to explain what he believes on major
issues.
You never know from day to
day where he stands.
But the exception that
proves the rule is Obama's unyielding, 100% support for
abortion. In this case a little "incoherence" would be most
welcomed.
Please send your
comments on Today's News & Views and National Right to Life News
Today to
daveandrusko@gmail.com. If you like, join those who are now
following me on Twitter at
http://twitter.com/daveha.
Part One
Part Two |