Responses to Abortion as a
"Wedge Issue" and Downloading an Important Petition
Part One of Three
By Dave Andrusko
Good evening and thanks
for reading TN&V and National Right to Life News Today.
Part Two
discusses the poll that shows that people believe abortions are
too easily procured. Part Three looks at President Obama's
precipitous fall. At National Right to Life News Today, you'll
find three stories well worth your time. Please send your
comments on Today's News & Views and National Right to Life News
Today to
daveandrusko@gmail.com. If you like, join those who are
following me on Twitter.
By far the best part of
composing TN&V and National Right to Life News Today is reading
the responses of our loyal readers. In just a second I'll pass
on some of their keen insights from yesterday's stash of emails.
But first I wanted to
remind you of an important resource. It's a petition from
National Right to Life to members of Congress asking them to
repeal Obama's pro-abortion, pro-rationing health care law and
to vote in support of the Protect Life Act (H.R. 5111) which
would repeal or correct all of the abortion-related problems in
the bill. "Repeal Obama's Health Care Law" is downloadable at
http://www.stoptheabortionagenda.com/files/Repeal-Obama-HCL.pdf.
Take a couple of moments
out to avail yourself of this important asset, and be sure that
your social network contacts are aware of it as well.
There was feedback to many
of the items we passed along to you, but most of all to a piece
I titled, "Don't be Fooled by the Nonsense that Abortion is a
'Wedge Issue'" (www.nrlc.org/News_and_Views/Aug10/nv081610.html).
Readers offered numerous
true-life stories. The common denominator was how they pointed
out the absurdities of the typical case for death by abortion
and then went on to ridicule the even more ridiculous conclusion
that abortion is a "distraction" employed to take people away
from "real" issues. In fact, as they explained, the fight over
the fate of millions of unborn children is a first-principle
debate about who is a member of the human family whom we have an
obligation to protect.
Another reader wrote about
a garage sale her local pro-life group conducted to raise funds.
The goods were largely left over from more affluent
neighborhoods. They had a small pro-life display at the end of
the driveway. Those who purchased the items were anything but
rich. "In all those people for all four days we had not one
negative response. Black, white, Hispanic, Middle
Easterner--none had anything bad to say." To the contrary their
pro-life expressions were touching and moving.
"A political 'wedge
issue'? she asked? "No, these really poor people know the value
of life. There was no waffling."
Other respondents
fine-tuned some of my distinctions. (I will combine several
responses to make a larger point.) People who throw about the
term "wedge issue" are suggesting insincerity, an unimportance,
and something that is forced in out of the blue that doesn't
really belong in polite company.
But the minds of many of
the same people who can amiably debate almost any other "social
issue," no matter how contentious, lock shut when the abortion
issue is raised. This can be interpreted in many ways but one
thing it illustrates for sure is that the destruction of the
little ones makes countless numbers of people very
uncomfortable.
Why? For a thousand
different reasons, but often because in their heart of hearts
people know that abortion violates every principle they espouse
in every other setting. Living with that inconsistency requires
that they not think about abortion.
I appreciate your
comments, as I do to every TN&V and every item at National Right
to Life News Today (www.nationalrighttolifenews.org).
Please be sure to respond to
daveandrusko@gmail.com
and download the petition at
http://www.stoptheabortionagenda.com/files/Repeal-Obama-HCL.pdf.
Part Two
Part Three |