"Words Are Important":
Reflections on Canada's Bill
C-384
Part Three of Three
By Dave Andrusko
One of the goals of TN&V is to
introduce our readers to
pro-life voices they may not
have already heard. So as not to
drown you in information, I try
to be discrete. Let me introduce
Susan Martinuk, a columnist for
the Calgary Herald.
Actually, this is the formal
introduction. We've already met
her earlier this week through a
discussion of one of her fine
column. ("It's been a tough week
for pro-choicers."
www.nrlc.org/News_and_Views/April10/nv042110part2.html).
Her latest column, which appears
today in the Calgary Herald, is
absolutely stunningly
insightful, carefully parsing
the many extraordinarily
dangerous components of Canada's
Bill C-384. It is so filled with
memorably phrasing I could
easily write a piece longer than
her op-ed (but won't).
The bill was the third go-round
by MP Francine Lalonde.
Opponents hope this means third,
as in "Three Strikes You're
Out." But we all know better.
Martinuk begins with a truism
too often neglected: "Words are
important." The key to her
op-ed, and to understanding so
much "death with dignity"
legislation, is captured in one
sentence--"The words in the Bill
may have appeared to be adequate
but, once analyzed and broken
down, they are filled with
contradictions."
To take just one example, Bill
C-384 would ostensibly limit the
"right" to people 18 years of
age and older. But this fails to
acknowledge "that Canada's
Supreme Court has held that
minor children who have the
cognitive capacity to understand
treatment cannot be
discriminated against."
Martinuk adds wisely, "It also
fails to consider that the
Netherlands, the McDonald's of
the euthanasia movement in that
it is the world leader in
numbers euthanized, has now
dropped that age to as low as
12."
A great analysis, one you can
read in five minutes. It is
worth your time just to read her
uplifting explanation of true
compassion.
Let me conclude with Martinuk's
final paragraph. It masterfully
captures the incoherency of
"assisted suicide."
"As noted by commentator Peter
Stockland, 'how could a
civilized society put up fences
on its high bridges to prevent
suicide, yet lower the bed
railings of its hospitals to
permit the same act? Suicide is
suicide, whether it's the
assisted or do-it-yourself
variety.'"
"Three strikes and suicide bill
is out -- hopefully" can be
found at
www.calgaryherald.com/health/Three+strikes+suicide+bill+hopefully/2941248/story.html.
Please send your comments to
daveandrusko@gmail.com and
please read our new pro-life
blog, "National Right to Life
News Today (www.nationalrighttolifenews.org).
Part One
Part Two |