|
Oklahoma Senate Passes Five More
Pro-Life Bills
Part Three of Three
By Dave Andrusko
Second only to careful planning
and inspired leadership, what
makes passage of pro-life
legislation possible is patient
persistence. It would be hard to
find a better example than in
Oklahoma where pro-lifers
refused to buckle under when
victory was snatched away based
on arbitrary judicial decisions
invalidating laws enacted laws
enacted in 2008 and 2009.
Yesterday, despite feverish
pro-abortion opposition, the
Oklahoma Senate passed five more
pro-life bills. Three of the
bills have been sent to Gov.
Brad Henry and the other two
have returned to the House for
acceptance of Senate amendments.
 |
|
Tony Lauinger, state
chairman of Oklahomans
For Life |
TN&V readers will remember that
on April 5 Oklahoma passed three
other pro-life bills [www.nrlc.org/News_and_Views/April10/nv040510.html].
Those banned sex-selection
abortions, regulated the use of
RU 486, and affirmed the right
of health care professionals not
to participate in abortions or
other actions that cause the
destruction of an innocent human
life.
All of these pro-life provisions
had been passed previously but
invalidated by the courts which
ruled they violated the state's
"single-subject" rule.
Yesterday's bills include HB
2780, an important addition to
help women make truly informed
decisions. The bill provides a
woman with an ultrasound of her
unborn child which she may view
prior to undergoing an abortion.
"The information gained from the
ultrasound could spare the
mother a lifetime of
psychological anguish," said
Tony Lauinger, state chairman of
Oklahomans For Life. "Ignorance
isn't bliss, where life-or-death
matters are concerned. And
ignorance isn't forever. Someday
she'll see an ultrasound -- in a
magazine, on television, on a
friend's refrigerator. Better
that she see it before
undertaking an irrevocable,
lethal act."
A second bill addresses the
information vacuum surrounding
abortion. HB 3284 provides that
abortions be reported, including
the reasons the abortion was
sought and any complications.
HB 2656 disallows the ugly
practice of "wrongful-life"
lawsuits, which start from the
premise that a baby with
disabilities would have been
better off aborted. HB 3075
deals with a truth that crisis
pregnancies centers know all too
well and the wider public not at
all. Many abortions are not in
any sense "voluntary." HB 3075
safeguards against coerced
abortions.
One new bill, made necessary
because of ObamaCare, is
pending. There is a provision in
the new health-care law that
allows states to opt out of
abortion coverage in the
state-based insurance
"exchanges" created by the law.
(See
http://www.nrlc.org/News_and_Views/April10/nv040810.html)
HB 3290, based on National Right
to Life's model statute,
prohibits all health plans
offered through the state
Exchange in Oklahoma from
including coverage for elective
abortions.
Please be sure to read
www.nationalrightolifenews.org
and send your comments to
daveandrusko@gmail.com.
Part One
Part Two |